Paper · 2020 · Agrica

Feasibility of green manuring by different legumes in trench planted sugarcane crop (Saccharum sp. hybrid)

Satendra Kumar; S.C. Singh; M.L. Srivastav; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at research farm of Genda Singh Sugarcane Breeding and Research Institute, Seorahi, Kushinagar, (U.P.) for two consecutive years i.e. 2017-18 and 2018-19, with the objective to find out suitable green manuring legume crop and fertilizer dose for enhancing the productivity of sugarcane. The experiment consists of eight treatments i.e.T-Sugarcane alone+150:60:40 NPK kg/ha, T2-Sugarcane alone+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha, T3- Sugarcane+Dhaincha+150:60:40 NPK kg/ha, T - Sugarcane+Dhaincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha, T - Sugarcane+Lobia+150:60:40 NPK kg/ha, T6- Sugarcane+Lobia+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha, T7- Sugarcane +Moong+ 1 50: 60: 40 NPK kg/ha and T - Sugarcane+Moong +180:80:60 NPK kg/ha. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replications. The experimental field was medium in organic carbon, medium in available phosphorus and low in potash. Sugarcane variety CoS 08272 was planted in spring season in paired row trench method at 150 cm (120:30 cm) spacing. Green manure crops were sown between the sugarcane planted trenches after two days of planting sugarcane crop and application of organo-decomposer @10 kg per hectare at the time of incorporation of green manuring crops at 45 days stage. The experimental findings on the basis of mean data two years revealed that germination per cent was not affected significantly by different treatments of green manures and fertilizer doses. Sugarcane+ daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha practice produced significantly higher shoot population (152890/ha), NMC (121650/ha), cane yield (114.07 t/ha) and CCS (14.88 t/ha) than that of green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/ha treatments. CCS per cent was not influenced significantly with different treatments. Maximum net income (255246 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.21) were obtained in sugarcane+dhaincha+ 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha treatment. It is concluded that intercropping of dhaincha as green manures in sugarcane with 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha resulted 10.35 per cent more cane yield and was found to be more feasible for sugarcane cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Green manure and fertilizer treatments did not significantly affect germination percentage.

Taxon
Sugarcanet0
Treatment
different treatments of green manures and fertilizer dosese0
Outcome
germination per cente0
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“Sugarcane”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“germination per cent was not affected significantly by different treatments of green manures and fertilizer doses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1320–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with daincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha produced significantly higher shoot population.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
shoot populatione0
Direction
highere0
Value
152890/hae0
Comparator
green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane+ daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha practice produced significantly higher shoot population (152890/ha), NMC (121650/ha), cane yield (114.07 t/ha) and CCS (14.88 t/ha) than that of green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/ha treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with daincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha produced significantly higher NMC.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
NMCe0
Direction
highere0
Value
121650/hae0
Comparator
green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane+ daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha practice produced significantly higher shoot population (152890/ha), NMC (121650/ha), cane yield (114.07 t/ha) and CCS (14.88 t/ha) than that of green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/ha treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with daincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha produced significantly higher cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
114.07 t/hae0
Comparator
green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane+ daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha practice produced significantly higher shoot population (152890/ha), NMC (121650/ha), cane yield (114.07 t/ha) and CCS (14.88 t/ha) than that of green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/ha treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with daincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha produced significantly higher CCS.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
CCSe0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.88 t/hae0
Comparator
green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/hae0

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Sugarcane+ daincha+180:80:60 NPK kg/ha practice produced significantly higher shoot population (152890/ha), NMC (121650/ha), cane yield (114.07 t/ha) and CCS (14.88 t/ha) than that of green manures with application of 150:60:40 NPK kg/ha treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1684 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Different treatments did not significantly influence CCS percentage.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
different treatmentse0
Outcome
CCS per cente0
Direction
not influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“CCS per cent was not influenced significantly with different treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1685–1757 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with dhaincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha yielded maximum net income of 255246 ha-1.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane+dhaincha+ 180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
net incomee0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
255246 ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum net income (255246 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.21) were obtained in sugarcane+dhaincha+ 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sugarcane with dhaincha and 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha yielded a benefit cost ratio of 2.21.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
sugarcane+dhaincha+ 180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
Maximume0
Value
2.21e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“Maximum net income (255246 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.21) were obtained in sugarcane+dhaincha+ 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1758–1888 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping dhaincha with 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha resulted in 10.35 per cent more cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropping of dhaincha as green manures in sugarcane with 180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
cane yielde0
Direction
moree0
Value
10.35 per cente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

t0

“sugarcane”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 · show in text ↑
e0

“intercropping of dhaincha as green manures in sugarcane with 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha resulted 10.35 per cent more cane yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2030 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that intercropping dhaincha with 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha was more feasible for sugarcane cultivation.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
intercropping of dhaincha as green manures in sugarcane with 180:80:60 NPK kg/hae0
Outcome
more feasible for sugarcane cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“intercropping of dhaincha as green manures in sugarcane with 180:80:60 NPK kg/ha resulted 10.35 per cent more cane yield and was found to be more feasible for sugarcane cultivation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2091 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

88 papers: 67 positive, 21 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

fertilization · pest · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

31 papers: 26 positive, 5 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 129 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.