Paper · 2020 · Crop Science

Novel sources of drought tolerance from landraces and wild sorghum relatives

Grace Ochieng; Kahiu Ngugi; Lydia N. Wamalwa; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
35
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Abstract Sorghum ( Sorghum bicolor [L.] Moench) is the fifth most important cereal crop worldwide and second after maize ( Zea mays L.) in Kenya. It is an important food security crop in arid and semi‐arid lands, where its production potential is hampered by drought. Drought tolerance can be measured by a plant's ability to resist premature senescence, often described as stay‐green. This study was carried out with the objective of identifying novel stay‐green trait among wild and landrace genotypes of sorghum. Forty‐four sorghum genotypes that included 16 improved, nine landraces, and 17 wild relatives of sorghum alongside known stay‐green sources, B35 and E36‐1, were evaluated under well‐watered and water‐stressed conditions in an alpha‐lattice design of three replications. Data was collected on plant height (PHT), flag leaf area (FLA), panicle weight (PWT), 100‐seed weight (HSW), relative chlorophyll content (RCC), number of green leaves at maturity (GLAM), days to 50% flowering (DFL), and grain yield (YLD). Genetic diversity was determined using diversity arrays technology (DArT) sequencing and quality control (QC) markers were generated using a java script. Lodoka, a landrace, was the most drought‐tolerant genotype, recorded the highest numbers of RCC and GLAM, and outperformed B35 and E36‐1 in yield under water‐stress and well‐watered conditions. The RCC was highly correlated with GLAM ( r = .71) and with yield‐related traits, HSW ( r = .85), PWT ( r = .82), and YLD ( r = .78). All traits revealed high heritability (broad‐sense) ranging from 60.14 to 98.4% for RCC and DFL, respectively. These results confirm earlier reports that wild relatives and landraces are a good source of drought tolerance alleles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The Lodoka landrace was the most drought-tolerant genotype.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Lodokae0
Outcome
drought‐tolerant genotypee0
Direction
moste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lodoka, a landrace, was the most drought‐tolerant genotype”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1238 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodoka had the highest relative chlorophyll content and green leaf number at maturity.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Lodokae0
Outcome
RCC and GLAMe0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Lodoka, a landrace, was the most drought‐tolerant genotype, recorded the highest numbers of RCC and GLAM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1284 · show in text ↑
e1

“relative chlorophyll content (RCC), number of green leaves at maturity (GLAM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodoka yielded more than B35 and E36-1 under both water regimes.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Material
Lodokae1
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
outperformede0
Qualifier
water‐stress and well‐watered conditionse0
Comparator
B35 and E36‐1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“outperformed B35 and E36‐1 in yield under water‐stress and well‐watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1290–1372 · show in text ↑
e1

“Lodoka, a landrace”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content correlated with green leaves at maturity at r=.71.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
RCCe0
Value
r = .71e0
Comparator
GLAMe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The RCC was highly correlated with GLAM ( r = .71)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1424 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content correlated with hundred-seed weight at r=.85.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
RCCe1
Value
r = .85e0
Comparator
HSWe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“HSW ( r = .85)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1456–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RCC was highly correlated with GLAM ( r = .71) and with yield‐related traits, HSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content correlated with panicle weight at r=.82.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
RCCe1
Value
r = .82e0
Comparator
PWTe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PWT ( r = .82)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1472–1486 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RCC was highly correlated with GLAM ( r = .71) and with yield‐related traits, HSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative chlorophyll content correlated with grain yield at r=.78.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
RCCe1
Value
r = .78e0
Comparator
YLDe0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“YLD ( r = .78)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1492–1506 · show in text ↑
e1

“The RCC was highly correlated with GLAM ( r = .71) and with yield‐related traits, HSW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability for RCC was 60.14%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
heritability (broad‐sense)e0
Value
60.14e0
Qualifier
RCCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All traits revealed high heritability (broad‐sense) ranging from 60.14 to 98.4% for RCC and DFL, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability for DFL was 98.4%.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
heritability (broad‐sense)e0
Value
98.4%e0
Qualifier
DFLe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All traits revealed high heritability (broad‐sense) ranging from 60.14 to 98.4% for RCC and DFL, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1508–1617 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The results identified wild relatives and landraces as sources of drought tolerance alleles.

Taxon
sorghumSorghumt0
Outcome
source of drought tolerance allelese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum
Sorghum · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Evelyn Simak · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wild relatives and landraces are a good source of drought tolerance alleles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1737 · show in text ↑
t0

“sorghum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–66 · show in text ↑