Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of micro and secondary nutrients on growth and yield of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper)

Dinesh Kumar Yadav; Devendra Singh; Anup Kumar Choubey; et al.

8
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during kharif 2015 at the experimental farm, Tirhut College of Agriculture, RPCAU, Pusa, Bihar to study the effect of micro and secondary nutrients on growth, yield and quality of blackgram (Vigna mungo (L.) Hepper) the experiment was laid-out in a randomized block design (RBD) with eight treatments, each having four replications. The treatments were T0: RDF (control), T1: RDF + B, T2: RDF + Zn, T3: RDF + S, T4: RDF + B + Zn, T5: RDF + B + S, T6: RDF + Zn + S and T7: RDF + Zn + B + S. Uniform basal application was made with 20 kg N ha-1, 40 kg P2O5 ha-1, 20 kg K2O ha-1 through urea, DAP and MOP, respectively. Sulphur, Zn and B were applied @ 20, 5 and 1.5 kg ha-1 from Bentonite-S, Zinc sulphate and Di-sodium tetra-borate pentahydrate, respectively. Plant height at 40 DAS, number of branches plant-1, number of nodules plant-1 at 40 and 50 DAS, grain yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments except plant population, plant height at harvest, number of nodules at 60 DAS and harvest index. The higher grain yield (838 kg ha-1) and straw yield (2472 kg ha-1) were obtained due to application of Zn + B + S.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected plant height at 40 DAS.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
Plant height at 40 DASe0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height at 40 DAS, number of branches plant-1, number of nodules plant-1 at 40 and 50 DAS, grain yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“The treatments were T0: RDF (control), T1: RDF + B, T2: RDF + Zn, T3: RDF + S, T4: RDF + B + Zn, T5: RDF + B + S, T6: RDF + Zn + S and T7: RDF + Zn + B + S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–522 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected branch number per plant.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
number of branches plant-1e0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of branches plant-1, number of nodules plant-1 at 40 and 50 DAS, grain yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 816–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected nodule number at 40 and 50 DAS.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
number of nodules plant-1 at 40 and 50 DASe0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of nodules plant-1 at 40 and 50 DAS, grain yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected grain yield.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
grain yield kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain yield kg ha-1, straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nutrient treatments significantly affected straw yield.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse0
Outcome
straw yield kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw yield kg ha-1, urdbean significantly affected due to various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–986 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant population, height at harvest, nodule count at 60 DAS, and harvest index were exceptions to the reported treatment effects.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
various treatmentse1
Outcome
plant population, plant height at harvest, number of nodules at 60 DAS and harvest indexe0
Comparator
RDF (control)e2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“except plant population, plant height at harvest, number of nodules at 60 DAS and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 987–1082 · show in text ↑
e1

“various treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 968–986 · show in text ↑
e2

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + B + S produced the highest grain yield, 838 kg ha-1.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
application of Zn + B + Se0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
838 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield (838 kg ha-1) and straw yield (2472 kg ha-1) were obtained due to application of Zn + B + S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn + B + S produced the highest straw yield, 2472 kg ha-1.

Taxon
blackgramVigna mungot0
Treatment
application of Zn + B + Se0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
2472 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
RDF (control)e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna mungo
Vigna mungo · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher grain yield (838 kg ha-1) and straw yield (2472 kg ha-1) were obtained due to application of Zn + B + S.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1199 · show in text ↑
e1

“T0: RDF (control)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–403 · show in text ↑
t0

“blackgram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–72 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Vigna mungo (black gram)Results differ

35 papers: 33 positive, 2 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.