Abstract
A field experiment was conducted for two years during kharif season of 2017 and 2018 at Agronomy research Farm, N.D. University of Agriculture and Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya (U.P.) on sandy loam soil with a pH of 8.1 to study the Influence of planting geometry and nitrogen levels on rice (Oryza sativa L.)”. The experiment was laid out in split plot design (SPD) with three replications Sixteen treatment combinations; comprised of four planting geometry, viz. (S1) 15x10 cm, 15x15 (S2),20x10 (S3) and 20x15 (S4) were kept in main plot and four nitrogen level, viz. 0kg/ha (N0), 60kg/ha (N1), 120kg/ha (N2) and 180kg/ha (N3) were kept in sub plot. Protein content of rice grain was not significantly affected due to planting geometry and N level during both the years of investigation, whereas plant spacing of 20×10cm recorded higher nitrogen uptake in grain which was at par with 15×15cm spacing while significant over rest both of the planting geometry. Cost of cultivation was recorded highest (Rs. 35435/ha) under S1N3 under planting geometry of 15×10cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha followed by (Rs.35045/ha), while application of 120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10cm spacing recorded highest gross return Rs.102140/ha followed by Rs. 101845/ha in 15×15cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha due to higher yield.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Rice grain protein content was not significantly affected by planting geometry and nitrogen level.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- planting geometry and N levele0
- Outcome
- Protein content of rice graine0
- Direction
- not significantly affectede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Protein content of rice grain was not significantly affected due to planting geometry and N level during both the years of investigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 20×10cm gave higher grain nitrogen uptake, at par with 15×15cm and significantly above the other geometries.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- plant spacing of 20×10cme0
- Outcome
- nitrogen uptake in graine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 15×15cm spacinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“plant spacing of 20×10cm recorded higher nitrogen uptake in grain which was at par with 15×15cm spacing while significant over rest both of the planting geometry.”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
The 15×10cm and 180kg N/ha combination had the highest cultivation cost of Rs. 35435/ha.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 15×10cm spacing applied with 180kg N/hae0
- Outcome
- Cost of cultivatione0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs. 35435/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Cost of cultivation was recorded highest (Rs. 35435/ha) under S1N3 under planting geometry of 15×10cm spacing applied with 180kg N/ha”
t0“rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Application of 120kg nitrogen/ha at 20×10cm had the highest gross return, Rs.102140/ha.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- 120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- gross returne0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- Rs.102140/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“application of 120kg nitrogen/ha given in 20×10cm spacing recorded highest gross return Rs.102140/ha”
t0“rice”
The same questions in other papers
nitrogen · quality: protein · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
96 papers more in this group
See all 100 papers →density · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
20 papers more in this group
See all 24 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.