Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth parameters of sweet corn

M. G. Jadhav; Indulkar Bs; AV Deshmukh; et al.

2
claims
3
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The success of future agriculture depends upon sustainability of production systems. The integrated nutrients management sustains the health of soils, ecosystems and people. It relies on ecological processes, biodiversity and cycles adapted to local conditions, rather than the use of chemical inputs with adverse effects. By considering above facts a field experiment was carried out during the kharif season 2018-19, at departmental farm of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, College of Agriculture, Latur. The experiment was laid out in RBD with 10 treatment combination along with three replications. Application of organic materials along with inorganic fertilizers in the soil leads to sustained productivity and fertility. Corn being an exhaustive crop, its requirement for fertilizers especially for nitrogen is very high. The results of field trial on response of sweet corn to application of chemical fertilizers along with organic manure and inoculation of liquid biofertilizers showed beneficial effect on growth parameters, nutrient uptake, yield and quality of sweet corn on low nitrogen and phosphorus content in inceptisol as compared to applied treatments content only chemical fertilizer. The growth parameter viz. root length and chlorophyll content significantly improved due to application of organic, inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizers found superior with treatments T10 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + PSB followed T7 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + Azospirillum respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 2

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chemical fertilizer, organic manure and liquid biofertilizers benefited sweet corn growth, nutrient uptake, yield and quality relative to chemical fertilizer alone.

Taxon
sweet corne0
Treatment
application of chemical fertilizers along with organic manure and inoculation of liquid biofertilizerse0
Outcome
growth parameters, nutrient uptake, yield and quality of sweet corne0
Direction
beneficial effecte0
Qualifier
low nitrogen and phosphorus content in inceptisole0
Comparator
only chemical fertilizere0

Verbatim

e0

“application of chemical fertilizers along with organic manure and inoculation of liquid biofertilizers showed beneficial effect on growth parameters, nutrient uptake, yield and quality of sweet corn on low nitrogen and phosphorus content in inceptisol as compared to applied treatments content only chemical fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 893–1211 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length and chlorophyll content improved significantly, with T10 superior and T7 next.

Taxon
sweet cornt0
Treatment
T10 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + PSBe0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
root length and chlorophyll contente0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
T7 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + Azospirillume0

Verbatim

e0

“root length and chlorophyll content significantly improved due to application of organic, inorganic fertilizers and biofertilizers found superior with treatments T10 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + PSB followed T7 -125% RDF + FYM @ 5t ha-1 + Azospirillum respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1239–1502 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–78 · show in text ↑

organic · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

inoculation · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 20 positive, 5 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 86 positive, 17 negative or no effect

85 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

171 papers: 157 positive, 14 negative or no effect

156 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

167 papers more in this group

See all 171 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.