Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of weed management practices on transplanted finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) in Bihar

MD Rashid Ashrafi; MK Singh; S Tyagi; et al.

1
claims
2
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Research Farmland, Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bhagalpur, Bihar during kharif season of 2019 to evaluate weed management practices in transplanted finger millet. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with three replication and consisting eleven treatment viz., T1 (Weedy check), T2 (Hoeing at 20 and 40 DAT), T3 (Pendimethalin @ 750 g ai ha-1 as pre-emergence), T4 (2, 4- D @ 750 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence), T5 (Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence), T6 (Pendimethalin @ 750 g ai ha-1 as pre-emergence fb 2, 4-D @ 750 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence), T7 (Pendimethalin @750 g ai ha-1 as pre-emergence fb Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence), T8 (Pretilachlor @1000 g ai ha-1 as pre-emergence), T9 (Pretilachlor @1000 g ai ha-1 as pre-emergence fb 2, 4- D @ 750 g ai ha-1 as post- emergence), T10 (Pretilachlor @1000 g ai ha-1 as pre- emergence fb Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post- emergence) and T11 (weed free). The results revealed that sequential application of Pretilachlor @1000 g / Pendimethalin @750 g ai ha-1 as pre-em fb Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence for higher yield, net return and B:C ratio of transplanted finger millet in Bihar.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 1

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential pretilachlor and bispyribac sodium gave higher yield, net return and benefit-cost ratio.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae0
Treatment
Pretilachlor @1000 g / Pendimethalin @750 g ai ha-1 as pre-em fb Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post-emergencee0
Interactor
weedt0weed
Outcome
yield, net return and B:C ratioe0
Direction
highere0
Setting
Bihare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sequential application of Pretilachlor @1000 g / Pendimethalin @750 g ai ha-1 as pre-em fb Bispyribac sodium @ 20 g ai ha-1 as post-emergence for higher yield, net return and B:C ratio of transplanted finger millet in Bihar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1039–1263 · show in text ↑
t0

“weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–35 · show in text ↑

bispyribac-sodium · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Pretilachlor · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.