Paper · 2016 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Weed management in rainfed finger millet

M.D. Tuti; Sher Singh; B.M. Pandey; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2014 at Experimental Farm, Hawalbagh, Almora, to know the effect of weed management practices on weed index and grain yield of rainfed finger millet. All the weed control measures significantly reduced total weed dry weight and weed index as compared to that of weedy check. Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (5.6 g/m2) significantly lowered the total weed dry weight followed by manual weeding at 20 DAS (7.4 g/m2). Weed dry matter recorded in weed wiper treated plots were at par with pre-emergence pendimethalin at 1 kg/ha and post-emergence 2, 4-D at 1 kg/ha. Apart from weed free check highest weed index was found in manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (82.0%) followed by manual weeding at 20 DAS (68.5%). Grain yield was significantly higher in hand weeding twice (2200 kg/ha) followed by weeding once (2.02 t/ha). The highest B: C ratio was in manual weeding at 20 DAS (1.39).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control measures significantly reduced total weed dry weight and weed index relative to the weedy check in rainfed finger millet.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
weed control measurese0
Outcome
total weed dry weight and weed indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
weedy checke0
Setting
Experimental Farm, Hawalbagh, Almorae6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e0

“All the weed control measures significantly reduced total weed dry weight and weed index as compared to that of weedy check”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 206–329 · show in text ↑
e6

“A field experiment was conducted during rainy season of 2014 at Experimental Farm, Hawalbagh, Almora”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–100 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS lowered total weed dry weight to 5.6 g/m2, followed by manual weeding at 20 DAS at 7.4 g/m2.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome
total weed dry weighte1
Direction
significantly lowerede1
Value
5.6 g/m2e1
Qualifier
7.4 g/m2e1
Comparator
manual weeding at 20 DASe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e1

“Manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (5.6 g/m2) significantly lowered the total weed dry weight followed by manual weeding at 20 DAS (7.4 g/m2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–469 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed dry matter in weed wiper treated plots was at par with pre-emergence pendimethalin at 1 kg/ha.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
weed wipere2
Outcome
Weed dry mattere2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
pre-emergence pendimethalin at 1 kg/hae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weed dry matter recorded in weed wiper treated plots were at par with pre-emergence pendimethalin at 1 kg/ha and post-emergence 2, 4-D at 1 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–616 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apart from the weed-free check, manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest weed index (82.0%).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
manual weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3
Outcome
weed indexe3
Direction
higheste3
Value
82.0%e3
Comparator
weed free checke3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e3

“Apart from weed free check highest weed index was found in manual weeding at 20 and 40 DAS (82.0%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–716 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding twice gave significantly higher grain yield (2200 kg/ha) than weeding once (2.02 t/ha).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
hand weeding twicee4
Outcome
grain yielde4
Direction
highere4
Value
2200 kg/hae4
Qualifier
2.02 t/hae4
Comparator
weeding oncee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e4

“Grain yield was significantly higher in hand weeding twice (2200 kg/ha) followed by weeding once (2.02 t/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–871 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manual weeding at 20 DAS gave the highest B:C ratio (1.39).

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanat0
Treatment
manual weeding at 20 DASe5
Outcome
B: C ratioe5
Direction
higheste5
Value
1.39e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Weed management in rainfed finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–40 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest B: C ratio was in manual weeding at 20 DAS (1.39)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–934 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 43 positive, 1 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

herbicide · weed · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

27 papers: 27 positive, 0 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.