Paper · 2020

Long-term impacts of inter-cropping and reduced tillage on ecosystem services in dryland agriculture

María Martínez-Mena; Elvira Díaz-Pereira; Noelia García-Franco; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions. In addition, the effect of the intensity of tillage practices (conventional tillage vs. reduced tillage) in the almond monocultures was also tested. The study was carried out in two farms located in the province of Murcia (South East Spain) and the experimental design consisted of nine plots (49 m long and 7 m wide) in a randomized-block design, with three replicates for each treatment: inter-crop, (IRT), monoculture under conventional tillage (MCT), and monoculture under reduced tillage (MRT). Each plot comprised five almond trees: the three central trees were used for soil measurements and the other two trees constituted guard rows (a buffer zone to avoid edge effects). The conventional tillage consists in a chisel plowing to 15 cm depth using a cultivator between three and five times a year while the reduced tillage treatments (MRT and IRT) implies ploughing only twice a year (autumn and spring), to control weeds. The tillage affects the whole plot area, including the area around the trunk base. In the monoculture, weeds are the only vegetation present between the rows. The inter-crop consists of a mix (3:1) of common vetch (Vicia sativa L.) and common oat (Avena sativa L.), sown annually during early autumn at 150 kg seeds ha-1 and mowed in May. After manually mowing, it is incorporated into the soil using a cultivator. During ten years (2009-2018) the effects of crop diversification and reduced tillage on a range of soil quality indicators (including soil physical, chemical and biological properties) were monitored allowing the evaluation of different support, regulating and provisioning ecosystem services (e.g. carbon sequestration, water availability, crop yield). An improvement in soil quality with the inter-crop management (IRT) was detected after three years from its implementation, after which it was maintained or slightly increased for ten years. When comparing the inter-cropping system with the monoculture one, an improvement in soil quality indicators for regulating and supporting ecosystem services was observed at the plow layer (e.g., soil bulk density decrease, as well as increases in soil water retention capacity, plant water availability, infiltration capacity, fertility, microbial activity, and OC stabilized in aggregates). During the first seven years of inter-cropping implementation, an average reduction of about 30% in the crop yield (provisioning ecosystem service) in the inter-crop treatment respect to the monoculture was observed. However, those differences decreased, or even were reversed after eight years, suggesting that the observed positive effect on crop production with inter-crops does not occur at the same time than the improvement on soil quality but several years after that. All together, these results highlight the potential of inter-cropping in woody crops as a good option to be adopted by farmers and for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil quality under inter-cropping improved after three years and was then maintained or slightly increased for ten years.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-crop management (IRT)e2
Outcome
soil qualitye2
Value
after three yearse2
Qualifier
maintained or slightly increased for ten yearse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e2

“An improvement in soil quality with the inter-crop management (IRT) was detected after three years from its implementation, after which it was maintained or slightly increased for ten years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1984–2173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-cropping decreased soil bulk density at the plow layer relative to monoculture.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-cropping systeme3
Outcome
soil bulk densitye3
Direction
decreasee3
Qualifier
at the plow layere3
Comparator
monoculturee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“When comparing the inter-cropping system with the monoculture one, an improvement in soil quality indicators for regulating and supporting ecosystem services was observed at the plow layer (e.g., soil bulk density decrease, as well as increases in soil water retention capacity, plant water availability, infiltration capacity, fertility, microbial activity, and OC stabilized in aggregates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2175–2566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-cropping increased soil water retention capacity, plant water availability and infiltration capacity at the plow layer relative to monoculture.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-cropping systeme3
Outcome
soil water retention capacity, plant water availability, infiltration capacitye3
Direction
increasese3
Qualifier
at the plow layere3
Comparator
monoculturee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“When comparing the inter-cropping system with the monoculture one, an improvement in soil quality indicators for regulating and supporting ecosystem services was observed at the plow layer (e.g., soil bulk density decrease, as well as increases in soil water retention capacity, plant water availability, infiltration capacity, fertility, microbial activity, and OC stabilized in aggregates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2175–2566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inter-cropping increased fertility, microbial activity and OC stabilized in aggregates at the plow layer relative to monoculture.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-cropping systeme3
Outcome
fertility, microbial activity, and OC stabilized in aggregatese3
Direction
increasese3
Qualifier
at the plow layere3
Comparator
monoculturee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e3

“When comparing the inter-cropping system with the monoculture one, an improvement in soil quality indicators for regulating and supporting ecosystem services was observed at the plow layer (e.g., soil bulk density decrease, as well as increases in soil water retention capacity, plant water availability, infiltration capacity, fertility, microbial activity, and OC stabilized in aggregates)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2175–2566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

During the first seven years, inter-cropping reduced crop yield by about 30% relative to monoculture.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-crop treatmente4
Outcome
crop yielde4
Direction
reductione4
Value
about 30%e4
Qualifier
During the first seven years of inter-cropping implementatione4
Comparator
monoculturee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e4

“During the first seven years of inter-cropping implementation, an average reduction of about 30% in the crop yield (provisioning ecosystem service) in the inter-crop treatment respect to the monoculture was observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2568–2783 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The yield difference between inter-crops and monoculture decreased or was reversed after eight years, which the authors suggest lags behind the soil quality improvement.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Treatment
inter-cropse5
Outcome
crop productione5
Direction
decreasede5
Qualifier
or even were reversed after eight yearse5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, those differences decreased, or even were reversed after eight years, suggesting that the observed positive effect on crop production with inter-crops does not occur at the same time than the improvement on soil quality but several years after that”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2785–3042 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend inter-cropping in woody crops as a good option for farmers and for climate change mitigation and adaptation.

Taxon
almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.)Prunus dulcise0
Outcome
potential of inter-cropping in woody crops as a good optione6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus dulcis
Prunus dulcis · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We assess the long-term environmental impacts and delivery of several ecosystem services of crop diversification (inter-crop with legumes/cereal) in two rainfed almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) orchards under semiarid Mediterranean conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3–241 · show in text ↑
e6

“All together, these results highlight the potential of inter-cropping in woody crops as a good option to be adopted by farmers and for climate change mitigation and adaptation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3044–3219 · show in text ↑

intercropping · yield · Prunus dulcis (almond)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.