Paper · 2020 · African Journal of Range and Forage Science

Analysis of main factors affecting silage fermentation of sorghum prepared with whole crop and stover in semiarid West Africa

Yimin Cai; Zhumei Du; Delma B Jethro; et al.

9
claims
22
verbatim quotes
15
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa as a combined crop for human consumption and animal feed. In order to address the shortage of ruminant feed in Burkina Faso, we studied the potential of preparing silage from sorghum at various growth stages and analysed the main factors affecting silage fermentation, including the microbial population, chemical composition and ensiling characteristics of sorghum prepared with and without microbial additives at three stages of development (soft dough; hard dough; physiological mature stover). After 90 d of ensiling, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) became the dominant microorganisms in silages. The silage from soft dough sorghum exhibited the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein content. In addition, silage presented greater quality with higher (p < 0.05) lactic acid content and lower (p < 0.05) pH and ammonia nitrogen levels than those at hard dough stage and stover. The WSC and LAB were the important factors affecting silage fermentation and the addition of LAB and cellulase improved fermentation quality. The combined additives displayed a synergistic effect and when silage is prepared with sorghum at soft dough stage, it has best potential for controlling spoilage microorganisms and preserving the silage quality for animal feed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage from soft dough sorghum had the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate and crude protein content.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
soft doughe1
Outcome
LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein contente1
Direction
higheste1
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The silage from soft dough sorghum exhibited the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–797 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage from soft dough sorghum had higher lactic acid content than silage from hard dough stage and stover.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
soft doughe1
Outcome
lactic acid contente2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
hard dough stage and stovere2
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The silage from soft dough sorghum exhibited the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–797 · show in text ↑
e2

“silage presented greater quality with higher (p < 0.05) lactic acid content and lower (p < 0.05) pH and ammonia nitrogen levels than those at hard dough stage and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage from soft dough sorghum had lower pH and ammonia nitrogen levels than silage from hard dough stage and stover.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
soft doughe1
Outcome
pH and ammonia nitrogen levelse2
Direction
lowere2
Comparator
hard dough stage and stovere2
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The silage from soft dough sorghum exhibited the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–797 · show in text ↑
e2

“silage presented greater quality with higher (p < 0.05) lactic acid content and lower (p < 0.05) pH and ammonia nitrogen levels than those at hard dough stage and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Silage from soft dough sorghum showed greater quality than silage from hard dough stage and stover.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
soft doughe1
Outcome
qualitye2
Direction
greatere2
Comparator
hard dough stage and stovere2
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e1

“The silage from soft dough sorghum exhibited the highest LAB counts, water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) and crude protein content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 670–797 · show in text ↑
e2

“silage presented greater quality with higher (p < 0.05) lactic acid content and lower (p < 0.05) pH and ammonia nitrogen levels than those at hard dough stage and stover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 812–981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After 90 days of ensiling, lactic acid bacteria became the dominant microorganisms in sorghum silages.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Outcome
dominant microorganismse3
Qualifier
After 90 d of ensilinge3
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e3

“After 90 d of ensiling, lactic acid bacteria (LAB) became the dominant microorganisms in silages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 572–668 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water-soluble carbohydrate was an important factor affecting silage fermentation of sorghum.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Compound
WSCe4
Outcome
silage fermentatione4
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e4

“The WSC and LAB were the important factors affecting silage fermentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of lactic acid bacteria and cellulase improved sorghum silage fermentation quality compared with silage without microbial additives.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
addition of LAB and cellulasee5
Outcome
fermentation qualitye5
Direction
improvede5
Comparator
without microbial additivese6
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e5

“the addition of LAB and cellulase improved fermentation quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1123 · show in text ↑
e6

“sorghum prepared with and without microbial additives at three stages of development”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 432–516 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined microbial additives had a synergistic effect on sorghum silage.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Treatment
combined additivese7
Outcome
synergistic effecte7
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e7

“The combined additives displayed a synergistic effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1178 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Silage prepared from sorghum at the soft dough stage has the best potential for controlling spoilage microorganisms and preserving silage quality for animal feed.

Taxon
Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)Sorghum bicolore0
Organ / stage
soft dough stagee7
Outcome
controlling spoilage microorganisms and preserving the silage qualitye7
Setting
semiarid West Africae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) is widely cultivated in semiarid West Africa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–73 · show in text ↑
e7

“when silage is prepared with sorghum at soft dough stage, it has best potential for controlling spoilage microorganisms and preserving the silage quality for animal feed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1183–1352 · show in text ↑

inoculation · quality: general · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.