Paper · 2020 · Cereal Chemistry

Effect of agronomic management on rice grain quality Part IV: Sowing rate

Rachael Maree Wood; Brian W. Dunn; Daniel L. E. Waters; et al.

12
claims
25
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Background and objectives There are no published data on the effect of sowing rate on rice grain quality traits of medium‐ and short‐grain cultivars within the Australian environment. Studies that have reported on the impact of sowing rate on grain quality in other rice growing regions have assessed differences between densities below 100 plants/m 2 , which is the minimum target for Australian grown rice. Furthermore, the cultivars evaluated were long‐grain cultivars only. The effect of sowing rate (25–150 kg/ha) on the quality traits of a short (YRK5)‐ and medium (Viand)‐grain rice cultivar was investigated over two seasons. Nitrogen (N) application was included in the study as the appropriate combination of sowing and N rate for maximum yield for both cultivars was unknown. Findings Sowing and N rate affected the number of grains per panicle and plants established per m 2 of both cultivars; however, changes in these parameters did not affect crop yield. The number of grains per panicle affected thousand‐grain weight (TGW) and head rice yield (HRY; the percentage of grain that remains whole or at least 75% of the original length after milling), and the response differed between cultivars. Decreasing sowing rate increased the number of grains per panicle, reduced grain length and TGW, and slightly increased HRY in Viand. In YRK5, decreased sowing rate increased TGW and in season two reduced HRY. Protein content was negatively correlated with TGW and positively correlated with HRY. There were no consistent differences in the physicochemical and cooking parameters between densities over both seasons in both cultivars. Conclusion These results indicate that plant density has an indirect effect on milling quality by influencing TGW, which affected total protein content, and thus, HRY and the response differ between cultivars. Furthermore, this study demonstrated that within a population of 18 to 231 plants/m 2 at establishment, the physicochemical and cooking parameters are not affected by sowing rate. Significance and novelty This study is the first to analyze the grain physicochemical and cooking quality parameters at densities above 100 plants/m 2 and evaluate the effect of sowing rate on the grain quality of differing grain types within Australia. Comparisons between the low (50–70 kg/ha) and standard sowing rate (130–150 kg/ha) revealed no difference in HRY, and these results are important to farmers and demonstrate a reduction in plant density due to poor establishment, environmental or bird damage does not affect crop yield or grain quality and thus their economic return.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing and N rates affected grains per panicle and established plants per square metre.

Treatment
Sowing and N ratee0
Outcome
number of grains per panicle and plants established per m 2e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sowing and N rate affected the number of grains per panicle and plants established per m 2 of both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Changes in grains per panicle and established plant density did not affect crop yield.

Treatment
Sowing and N ratee1
Outcome
crop yielde0
Direction
did not affecte0
Qualifier
changes in these parameterse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changes in these parameters did not affect crop yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–978 · show in text ↑
e1

“Sowing and N rate affected the number of grains per panicle and plants established per m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 805–895 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grains per panicle affected thousand-grain weight and head rice yield differently between cultivars.

Organ / stage
grains per paniclee0
Outcome
thousand‐grain weight (TGW) and head rice yield (HRYe0
Qualifier
response differed between cultivarse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The number of grains per panicle affected thousand‐grain weight (TGW) and head rice yield (HRY; the percentage of grain that remains whole or at least 75% of the original length after milling), and the response differed between cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 979–1217 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing rate increased grains per panicle in Viand.

Material
Viande0
Treatment
Decreasing sowing ratee0
Outcome
number of grains per paniclee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing sowing rate increased the number of grains per panicle, reduced grain length and TGW, and slightly increased HRY in Viand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing rate reduced grain length and TGW in Viand.

Material
Viande0
Treatment
Decreasing sowing ratee0
Outcome
grain length and TGWe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing sowing rate increased the number of grains per panicle, reduced grain length and TGW, and slightly increased HRY in Viand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing rate slightly increased HRY in Viand.

Material
Viande0
Treatment
Decreasing sowing ratee0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Decreasing sowing rate increased the number of grains per panicle, reduced grain length and TGW, and slightly increased HRY in Viand.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1351 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing rate increased TGW in YRK5.

Material
YRK5e0
Treatment
decreased sowing ratee0
Outcome
TGWe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In YRK5, decreased sowing rate increased TGW and in season two reduced HRY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower sowing rate reduced HRY in YRK5 during season two.

Material
YRK5e0
Treatment
decreased sowing ratee0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
in season twoe0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In YRK5, decreased sowing rate increased TGW and in season two reduced HRY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1352–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content was negatively correlated with TGW.

Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
negatively correlatede0
Comparator
TGWe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content was negatively correlated with TGW”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1478 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content was positively correlated with HRY.

Outcome
Protein contente0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
HRYe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Protein content was negatively correlated with TGW and positively correlated with HRY.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1428–1514 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Physicochemical and cooking parameters showed no consistent density differences across seasons and cultivars.

Treatment
densitiese0
Outcome
physicochemical and cooking parameterse0
Direction
no consistent differencese0
Qualifier
over both seasons in both cultivarse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no consistent differences in the physicochemical and cooking parameters between densities over both seasons in both cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1515–1652 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low and standard sowing rates did not differ in head rice yield.

Treatment
low (50–70 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
HRYe0
Direction
no differencee0
Comparator
standard sowing rate (130–150 kg/ha)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Comparisons between the low (50–70 kg/ha) and standard sowing rate (130–150 kg/ha) revealed no difference in HRY”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2297–2409 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–52 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

329 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.