Paper · 2020 · Agronomy

Organic Carrot (Daucus carota L.) Production Has an Advantage over Conventional in Quantity as Well as in Quality

Ingrid Bender; Liina Edesi; Inga Hiiesalu; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
34
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Organic production is one of the fastest growing food sectors globally. However, average yield in organic vegetable production is up to 33% lower than in conventional production. This difference could be due to higher fertilization rates in conventional, compared to organic, farming. We aimed to compare yield and quality characteristics of carrots produced under equal nitrogen fertilization rates over four years in organic and conventional conditions. We found a 14.5% higher marketable, and 10.0% lower discarded, yield in the organic compared to the average conventional treatments. In addition, carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally. There were no convincing effects of cultivation system on the nitrogen, total sugar, or dry matter content of carrots. Organically managed carrots were free of pesticide residues, while several residues were found in carrots managed conventionally. Our study reveals that organic management of carrots may exceed that of conventional methods in yield and several quality characteristics, while being free of pesticide residues. Organic fertilizer gave an advantage over mineral fertilizer, when equal rates of nitrogen were used in both production systems.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carrots had 14.5% higher marketable yield.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae1
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
marketablee0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.5%e0
Comparator
average conventional treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found a 14.5% higher marketable, and 10.0% lower discarded, yield in the organic compared to the average conventional treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–14 · show in text ↑
e1

“carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carrots had 10.0% lower discarded yield.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae1
Treatment
organice0
Outcome
discarded, yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
10.0%e0
Comparator
average conventional treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“We found a 14.5% higher marketable, and 10.0% lower discarded, yield in the organic compared to the average conventional treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–14 · show in text ↑
e1

“carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carrots had 14.1% lower nitrate.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
managed organicallye0
Outcome
nitratee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14.1%e0
Comparator
carrots managed conventionallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carrots had 10.0% higher vitamin C.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
managed organicallye0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
10.0%e0
Comparator
carrots managed conventionallye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–724 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivation system showed no convincing effects on nitrogen, sugar or dry matter.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
cultivation systeme0
Outcome
nitrogen, total sugar, or dry matter contente0
Direction
no convincing effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no convincing effects of cultivation system on the nitrogen, total sugar, or dry matter content of carrots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 726–843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic carrots lacked pesticide residues.

Taxon
carrotsDaucus carotae0
Treatment
Organically managede0
Outcome
free of pesticide residuese0
Comparator
carrots managed conventionallye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organically managed carrots were free of pesticide residues, while several residues were found in carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 845–973 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer outperformed mineral fertilizer at equal nitrogen rates.

Taxon
CarrotDaucus carotat0
Treatment
Organic fertilizere0
Outcome
advantagee0
Direction
advantagee0
Comparator
mineral fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizer gave an advantage over mineral fertilizer, when equal rates of nitrogen were used in both production systems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1154–1281 · show in text ↑
t0

“Carrot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 8–14 · show in text ↑
e1

“carrots managed organically had 14.1% lower nitrate and 10.0% higher vitamin C content than carrots managed conventionally”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 602–724 · show in text ↑

cultivation system · yield · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 3 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

cultivation system · quality: postharvest · Daucus carota (carrot)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.