Abstract
A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar. The experiment was laid out in split plot design with twenty treatments in respect of its four main plots and five sub-plots. The main plot contain four different tillage methods i.e. M1 (conventional), M2 (reduced), M3 (zero till), and M4 (glyphosate treated zero till). The sub-plots contain five different type of weed management practices i.e. W1 (Atrazine@ 1.0 kg/ha), W2 (oxyfluorfen@ 0.03 kg/ha), W3 (metolachlor@ 1.0 kg/ha), W4 (Two hand weedings and earthing up) and W5 (weedy check). The removal of N, P and K by weeds (68.75, 12.03 and 108.67 kg/ha) was the highest in the weedy check treatment. The nutrient content of grain and stover of maize in oxyfluorfen treated plots were maximum. Weedy check reported the lowest value of N, P and K content as compared with weed control treatments. The highest grain yield was recorded with glyphosate treated zero tillage method followed by zero tillage and the lowest was recorded with conventional tillage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Weeds removed 68.75, 12.03 and 108.67 kg/ha of N, P and K, the highest removal occurring in the weedy check.
- Treatment
- weedy checke1
- Interactor
- weedse1weed
- Outcome
- removal of N, P and K by weedse1
- Direction
- higheste1
- Value
- 68.75, 12.03 and 108.67 kg/hae1
- Setting
- Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Statione0
Zea maysNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar”
e1“The removal of N, P and K by weeds (68.75, 12.03 and 108.67 kg/ha) was the highest in the weedy check treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
Oxyfluorfen-treated maize plots had the maximum nutrient content in grain and stover.
- Organ / stage
- grain and stovere2
- Treatment
- oxyfluorfene2
- Outcome
- nutrient content of grain and stovere2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Setting
- Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Statione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar”
e2“The nutrient content of grain and stover of maize in oxyfluorfen treated plots were maximum”
Claim · model-written summary
The weedy check had the lowest N, P and K content compared with weed control treatments.
- Treatment
- Weedy checke3
- Outcome
- N, P and K contente3
- Direction
- loweste3
- Comparator
- weed control treatmentse3
- Setting
- Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Statione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar”
e3“Weedy check reported the lowest value of N, P and K content as compared with weed control treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Glyphosate-treated zero tillage gave the highest grain yield of winter maize.
- Treatment
- glyphosate treated zero tillage methode4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- higheste4
- Comparator
- zero tillagee4
- Setting
- Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Statione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar”
e4“The highest grain yield was recorded with glyphosate treated zero tillage method followed by zero tillage and the lowest was recorded with conventional tillage”
Claim · model-written summary
Conventional tillage gave the lowest grain yield of winter maize.
- Treatment
- conventional tillagee4
- Outcome
- grain yielde4
- Direction
- loweste4
- Comparator
- glyphosate treated zero tillage methode4
- Setting
- Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Statione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A field experiment entitled “Tillage and weed management in winter maize” was conducted during the rabi season 2013 at Agronomy Research Farm, Central Research Station, Orissa University of Agriculture and Technology, Bhubaneswar”
e4“The highest grain yield was recorded with glyphosate treated zero tillage method followed by zero tillage and the lowest was recorded with conventional tillage”
The same questions in other papers
glyphosate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
73 papers more in this group
See all 77 papers →Oxyfluorfen · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
1,095 papers more in this group
See all 1,099 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.