Paper · 2019 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Effect of native actinobacteria on root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita in brinjal

N. Swarnakumari; M. Pandiyan

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Root knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita is one of the major nematodes infesting brinjal. It is wide spread in India. An attempt was made to exploit rhizosphere bioagents for the management of root knot nematode. Rhizosphere soil samples were collected from healthy brinjal plants of nematode infested sick field at Virinchipuram village, Tamil Nadu. Around six Bacillus sp. isolates and one actinobacteria isolate were obtained from soil. Preliminary screening was done with culture filtrates of these isolates on egg hatching and nematode penetration. The observations showed that actinobacteria (V5) cultural filtrate @ 75% concentration showed 51.7 % inhibition in egg hatching compared to control. A significant reduction in juvenile penetration (tc > tt) and number of galls per plant as well as number of egg masses were observed in actinobacteria treated brinjal (variety VRM1) plants. A pot culture experiment was carried out to test the effect actinobacteria (V5) in brinjal against M. incognita. Results revealed that the egg mass production was reduced to an extent of 55 % compared to untreated control by the application of actinobacteria culture filtrate.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria V5 culture filtrate at 75% concentration inhibited egg hatching of Meloidogyne incognita by 51.7% compared with control.

Treatment
actinobacteria (V5) cultural filtrate @ 75% concentratione0
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
actinobacteria (V5)Actinomycetotae0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg hatchinge0
Direction
inhibitione0
Value
51.7 %e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“actinobacteria (V5) cultural filtrate @ 75% concentration showed 51.7 % inhibition in egg hatching compared to control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–702 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Actinobacteria-treated brinjal plants showed a significant reduction in juvenile penetration and in galls per plant by M. incognita.

Material
VRM1e1
Treatment
actinobacteriae1
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
actinobacteriaActinomycetotae1biocontrol_agent
Outcome
juvenile penetratione1
Direction
reductione1
Qualifier
number of galls per plante1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–87 · show in text ↑
e1

“A significant reduction in juvenile penetration (tc > tt) and number of galls per plant as well as number of egg masses were observed in actinobacteria treated brinjal (variety VRM1) plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–893 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of actinobacteria culture filtrate reduced egg mass production of M. incognita by 55% compared with untreated control.

Treatment
application of actinobacteria culture filtratee2
Interactor
Meloidogyne incognitaMeloidogyne incognitat0pest
Second interactor
actinobacteriaActinomycetotae2biocontrol_agent
Outcome
egg mass productione2
Direction
reducede2
Value
55 %e2
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum melongena
Solanum melongena · TaxonBeraDigle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Meloidogyne incognita in brinjal”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–87 · show in text ↑
e2

“egg mass production was reduced to an extent of 55 % compared to untreated control by the application of actinobacteria culture filtrate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1034–1170 · show in text ↑

pathogen product · Meloidogyne incognita · Solanum melongena (eggplant)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.