Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at College farm, College of Agriculture, Professor Jayashankar Telangana State Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad during kharif 2017. The experiment was laid out in randomized block design with nine treatments and three replications. The soil of the experimental field was sandy loam in texture, neutral in reaction (pH 7.38) and available nitrogen (264.6 kg/ha), phosphorus (30.9 kg/ha) and potassium (299.8 kg/ha). Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS and it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively). Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave significantly higher green fodder yield (68.26 t/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: highere1
Value: 68.26 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave significantly higher dry fodder yield (15.51 t/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: highere1
Value: 15.51 t/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave significantly higher crude protein yield (1364 kg/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: highere1
Value: 1364 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave green fodder yield of 64.94 t/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 64.94 t/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave dry fodder yield of 14.76 t/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 14.76 t/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave crude protein yield of 1312 kg/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 1312 kg/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave green fodder yield of 63.38 t/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 63.38 t/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave dry fodder yield of 14.41 t/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 14.41 t/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave crude protein yield of 1286 kg/ha, closely behind hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe2
Outcome: Green, dry fodder and crude protein yielde1
Direction: lowerinferrede2
Value: 1286 kg/hae2
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe1

Verbatim

e1
“Green, dry fodder and crude protein yield was significantly higher (68.26 t/ha, 15.51 t/ha and 1364 kg/ha respectively) with hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 465–619 · show in text ↑

e2
“it was closely followed by topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (64.94 t/ha, 14.76 t/ha and 1312 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (63.38 t/ha, 14.41 t/ha and 1286 kg/ha respectively)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 624–957 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest crop uptake of N (218.38 kg/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: higheste3
Value: 218.38 kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest crop uptake of P (42.73 kg/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: higheste3
Value: 42.73 kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS gave the highest crop uptake of K (178.86 kg/ha) in fodder maize.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: higheste3
Value: 178.86 kg/hae3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave crop N uptake of 210.03 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 210.03 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave crop P uptake of 40.07 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 40.07 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Topramezone plus atrazine gave crop K uptake of 168.71 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 168.71 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave crop N uptake of 205.87 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 205.87 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave crop P uptake of 38.43 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 38.43 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tembotrione plus atrazine gave crop K uptake of 161.44 kg/ha, on par with hand weeding.

Taxon: fodder maizet0
Treatment: tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DASe3
Outcome: uptake of N, P, K by crope3
Direction: no_changeinferrede3
Value: 161.44 kg/hae3
Comparator: hand weeding at 20 and 40 DASe3

Verbatim

e3
“Hand weeding at 20 and 40 DAS recorded highest uptake of N, P, K by crop (218.38 kg/ha, 42.73 kg/ha and 178.86 kg/ha respectively), which was on par with topramezone 33.6% SC @ 25.2 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (210.03 kg/ha, 40.07 kg/ha and 168.71 kg/ha respectively) and tembotrione 42% SC @ 105 g a.i ha-1 + atrazine 50% WP @ 500 g a.i ha-1 tank mix as PoE at 20 DAS (205.87 kg/ha, 38.43 kg/ha and 161.44 kg/ha)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 959–1416 · show in text ↑

t0
“Effect of weed management practices on yield and nutrient uptake of fodder maize (Zea mays L.)”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–94 · show in text ↑

atrazine · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 12 positive, 6 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

negative
Dicamba, atrazine plus dicamba, and atrazine plus bentazon decreased 14 C-sethoxydim absorption by 9 to 63% across grass weed species.
Interactions of Sethoxydim and Corn (Zea mays) Postemergence Broadleaf Herbicides on Three Annual Grasses · 1996
Opposite direction
no effect
Atrazine did not increase phosphorus uptake in corn.
Enhanced Phytotoxicity of Atrazine-Phosphate Combinations · 1973
Opposite direction
negative
Atrazine significantly reduced 45Ca absorption.
Herbicidal Influence on the Uptake of Total and Applied Calcium in Maize (Zea mays L.) · 1977
Opposite direction

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

topramezone · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

positive
Topramezone plus atrazine produced crude protein yield of 1.51 t/ha.
Assessing the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weed Flora, Growth and Yield of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023
Same directionCites this paper

See all 2 papers →

tembotrione · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

positive
Pendimethalin followed by tembotrione maize had 11.03% protein.
Protein and starch content in maize (Zea mays L.) as influenced by herbicidal weed management · 2021 · compared with weedy check
Same direction

See all 2 papers →

topramezone · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Atrazine plus topramezone at 20 DAS maximized crop potassium uptake at 130.42 Kg ha-1.
Effect of Different Post-emergence Herbicides Tank Mix with Atrazine on Nutrient uptake and Chlorophyll Content in Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2021 · compared with all other herbicidal treatments
Same direction
positive
Topramezone plus atrazine as post-emergence treatment lowered nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium uptake by weeds.
Response of Weed Management on Growth, Yield and Yield Attributes of Kharif maize (Zea mays L.) · 2022
Same direction

See all 3 papers →

tembotrione · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

See all 4 papers →

atrazine · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

positive
Topramezone plus atrazine produced crude protein yield of 1.51 t/ha.
Assessing the Effect of Weed Management Practices on Weed Flora, Growth and Yield of Fodder Maize (Zea mays L.) · 2023
Same directionCites this paper
positive
Treated corn plants contained significantly more protein-N plus nucleic acid-N than untreated controls (increase 39.0%).
Effects of Low Levels of Atrazine on Some Mineral Constituents and Forms of Nitrogen in Zea mays L.¹ · 1972 · compared with untreated controls
Same direction
positive
Relatively higher soil concentrations (1 and 4 lb./A) of simazine, atrazine, prometone, igran or ametryne were needed to increase the protein content of sweet corn seeds.
The Nutritive Composition of Pea and Sweet Corn Seeds as Influenced by s-Triazine Compounds1,2 · 1971
Same direction

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

herbicide · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

22 papers: 17 positive, 5 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

negative
Pathogen infection or paraquat stress decreased total protein synthesis.
Translational Alterations in Maize Leaves Responding to Pathogen Infection, Paraquat Treatment, or Heat Shock · 1988
Opposite direction
no effect
Combined herbicide and NaCl caused relatively small alterations in water-soluble protein and nitrate content.
Glufosinate Phytotoxicity to Maize under Salt Stress Conditions · 2008
Opposite direction
no effect
The herbicide systems did not affect maize protein, oil or starch content.
Effectiveness of weed control in maize with two foliage treatments · 2013
Opposite direction

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

herbicide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

negative
Chlorsulfuron pretreatment inhibited stimulated potassium uptake in maize root tips.
Inhibition of fusicoccin‐stimulated K⁺/H⁺ transport in root tips from maize seedlings pretreated with Chlorsulfuron · 1987
Opposite direction
negative
Delaying herbicide application until April reduced early corn N uptake by 52 mg N per plant.
Winter Annual Weed Management and Nitrogen Rate Effects on Corn Yield · 2013 · compared with November–March
Opposite direction
no effect
Weed control measures did not significantly vary soil available N, P, K, bulk density or organic carbon.
Residual soil fertility and nutrient uptake in baby corn as influenced by nutrient sources and weed control measures · 2015
Opposite direction

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.

Abstract

Claims 18

The same questions in other papers

atrazine · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

topramezone · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

tembotrione · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

topramezone · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

tembotrione · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

atrazine · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

herbicide · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

herbicide · nutrient: content · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results