Abstract
A field experiment was conducted in Research Farm, Dept. of Agril. Meteorology, CCS HAU, Hisar (semi arid of Haryana) during rabi season 2012-13 and 2013-14. The results indicated that plant height, LAI, dry matter, seed yield and quality were affected by different sowing environments. The experiment was conducted with split plot design replicated four times with three dates of sowing viz., 10th October, 25th October, 8th November in 2012-13 and 21st October, 30th October, 10th November in 2013-14 were kept as main plot and three varieties viz., RH 30, Laxmi and RH 0749 as sub plot. Plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, yield and quality parameters were decreased significantly with successive delay in sowing, whereas among the varieties, RH 0749 conceive higher values. Among the crop seasons, 2012-13 has higher yield as compare to 2013-14. The relationship between seed yield and biological yield (R2=0.8743); seed yield and harvest index (R2=0.8593); oil yield and seed yield (R2=0.9215); oil yield and biological yield (R2=0.9011) have positively significant.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Successively later sowing significantly reduced plant height, dry matter and leaf area index.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Treatment
- successive delay in sowinge0
- Outcome
- Plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Plant height, dry matter accumulation, leaf area index, yield and quality parameters were decreased significantly with successive delay in sowing”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Successively later sowing significantly reduced yield and quality parameters.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Treatment
- successive delay in sowinge0
- Outcome
- yield and quality parameterse0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“yield and quality parameters were decreased significantly with successive delay in sowing”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
RH 0749 had higher trait values among varieties.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Material
- RH 0749e0
- Outcome
- higher valuese0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“among the varieties, RH 0749 conceive higher values”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield was higher in 2012-13 than in 2013-14.
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 2013-14e0
- Setting
- 2012-13e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“2012-13 has higher yield as compare to 2013-14”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield and biological yield were positively associated (R2=0.8743).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- positivelye1
- Value
- R2=0.8743e0
- Comparator
- biological yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“relationship between seed yield and biological yield (R2=0.8743)”
e1“have positively significant”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Seed yield and harvest index were positively associated (R2=0.8593).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- positivelye1
- Value
- R2=0.8593e0
- Comparator
- harvest indexe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“seed yield and harvest index (R2=0.8593)”
e1“have positively significant”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil yield and seed yield were positively associated (R2=0.9215).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Direction
- positivelye1
- Value
- R2=0.9215e0
- Comparator
- seed yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil yield and seed yield (R2=0.9215)”
e1“have positively significant”
t0“Indian mustard”
Claim · model-written summary
Oil yield and biological yield were positively associated (R2=0.9011).
- Taxon
- Indian mustard
Brassica junceat0
- Outcome
- oil yielde0
- Direction
- positivelye1
- Value
- R2=0.9011e0
- Comparator
- biological yielde0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“oil yield and biological yield (R2=0.9011)”
e1“have positively significant”
t0“Indian mustard”
The same questions in other papers
sowing time · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.