Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Early sowing (Oct. 18) gave more yield than late sowing (Nov. 20), irrespective of variety and chemical treatment.

A claim from Effect of Date of Sowing, Varieties and Chemical Treatments on the Development of Alternaria Blight and White Rust of Mustard · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Early sowing (Oct. 18) gave more yield than late sowing (Nov. 20), irrespective of variety and chemical treatment.

Taxon
Indian mustardBrassica junceae0
Treatment
Early sown crop (Oct. 18)e2
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
moree2
Qualifier
irrespective of variety and chemical treatmente2
Comparator
late sown crop (Nov. 20)e3

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Alternaria blight and white rust are major diseases seriously affecting Indian mustard crop in south west region of Punjab”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–122
e2

“Early sown crop (Oct. 18) contracted moderate attack of these diseases and gave more yield irrespective of variety and chemical treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–328
e3

“on late sown crop (Nov. 20) high intensity of white rust and Alternaria blight on leaf and inflorescence was recorded leading to less yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 339–478

Title

Effect of Date of Sowing, Varieties and Chemical Treatments on the Development of Alternaria Blight and White Rust of Mustard

Mukesh Yadav; S S Dhillon; J. S. Dhiman Journal of research 2002

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-9da54fa318c6342d936bf66aa9d783b770628ec3264bad415de276de9e9c70b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 14 positive, 12 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this claim · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.