Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sowing later than October significantly reduced flowering traits and seed yield from the seed parent.

A claim from Standardisation of hybrid seed production technology of first Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid NRCHB 506 · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing later than October significantly reduced flowering traits and seed yield from the seed parent.

Taxon
Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. & Coss)Brassica junceae1
Treatment
delay in sowing beyond Octobere0
Outcome
seed yield from seed parente0
Direction
declinee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica juncea
Brassica juncea · TaxonDalgial · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“delay in sowing beyond October reduces the value of those characters significantly leading to decline in seed yield from seed parent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–850
e1

“Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L. Czern. & Coss) hybrid NRCHB 506.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–220

Title

Standardisation of hybrid seed production technology of first Indian mustard (Brassica juncea) hybrid NRCHB 506

Aniruddha Maity; S K Chakravarty; J B Yadav The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 2012. doi:10.56093/ijas.v82i9.23828

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-a246b05f7a16afa9faa551c151e17c19a67d731db153cbdda7fc235d3db37236 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Brassica juncea (Indian mustard)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 14 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.