Abstract
An experiment was conducted at Rajasthan College of Agriculture, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Thechnology- Udaipur during the year of 2015-16 and 2016-17. Residual effect of herbicides and nutrient which were used in previous soybean crop with recommended dose of fertilizers to wheat did not influenced significantly in weed control as well as growth attributes, viz. plant height, plant dry matter and effective tillers/meter row length in wheat. Seed and straw yields, net monetary return and return/rupee invested were obtained higher under residual effect of propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75 +75 g ha-1) at 21 DAS with NPKS (20:40:30:40 kg ha-1). Similarly, nutrient uptake in terms of N, P and K were also found greatest under this treatment combination. However, overall residual impact was found non significant during both the year.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 4
Claim · model-written summary
Prior soybean herbicide and nutrient treatments did not significantly affect weed control or wheat growth attributes.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- herbicides and nutriente0
- Outcome
- weed control as well as growth attributes, viz. plant height, plant dry matter and effective tillers/meter row lengthe0
- Direction
- did not influencede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Residual effect of herbicides and nutrient which were used in previous soybean crop with recommended dose of fertilizers to wheat did not influenced significantly in weed control as well as growth attributes, viz. plant height, plant dry matter and effective tillers/meter row length in wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Residual propaquizafop plus imazethapyr with NPKS produced higher wheat seed and straw yields.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75 +75 g ha-1) at 21 DAS with NPKS (20:40:30:40 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- Seed and straw yieldse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed and straw yields, net monetary return and return/rupee invested were obtained higher under residual effect of propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75 +75 g ha-1) at 21 DAS with NPKS (20:40:30:40 kg ha-1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
That residual treatment gave higher net monetary return and return per rupee invested.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75 +75 g ha-1) at 21 DAS with NPKS (20:40:30:40 kg ha-1)e0
- Outcome
- net monetary return and return/rupee investede0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Seed and straw yields, net monetary return and return/rupee invested were obtained higher under residual effect of propaquizafop + imazethapyr (75 +75 g ha-1) at 21 DAS with NPKS (20:40:30:40 kg ha-1)”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
N, P and K uptake was greatest under the combined residual treatment.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- this treatment combinatione0
- Outcome
- nutrient uptake in terms of N, P and Ke0
- Direction
- greateste0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“nutrient uptake in terms of N, P and K were also found greatest under this treatment combination”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
Imazethapyr · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 362 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
397 papers more in this group
See all 401 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.