Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of weed management practices and seed rates on energy input, output, input output ratio, energy use efficiency and energy productivity on direct seeded rice production system

SK Jha; N. Pandey; Sunil Kumar

17
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The relation between agriculture and energy is very close, agricultural sector itself is an energy user and energy supplier in the form of bio-energy. An experiment was conducted during kharif 2013 and 2014 with six weed management and three seed rates in Inceptisols in strip plot design. Rice variety MTU 1010 was taken as test crop. Result reveled that traditional beushening method proved significantly superior seed yield over other weed management practices (52.5 q ha-1) was at par with the hand weeding twice (50.8 q ha-1) and sequential application pre -emergence oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DAS (50.2 q ha-1).Input energy was highest in biasi method (12.2 MJX103) followed by the hand weeding (11.9 MJX103). However, the weed management through herbicides shows low input energy as compared to the biasi method and hand weeding. The input energy was high in combine harvester as compared to manual harvesting system. Maximum output energy was recorded under the biasi method (152.7 MJX103) which was statistically superior over all the treatments. During the investigation seed rate does not influence the output energy and almost similar output energy was produced by the 120, 80 and 40 kg ha-1 seed rate. The maximum energy use efficiency (9.6) was recorded in withpre–emergence application of oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fbbispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASon mean basis. Efficiency of harvesting through harvester was less as compared to the manual harvesting but the difference was very marginal in both the years. However, harvester reduces the human energy in rice production system and promotes the timely operation. Energy productivity (.44kg MJ ha-1) was recorded maximum in pre -emergence application oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1 fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DAS treatment which was at par with biasi method and hand weeding and other chemical control method. High energy productivity in combine harvester reveals the production of more yields per hectare by the expenditure of input energy, although the output input ratio and energy use efficiency was high in manual harvesting method.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Traditional beushening method gave significantly superior seed yield (52.5 q ha-1) compared with other weed management practices.

Treatment
traditional beushening methode1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
superiore1
Value
52.5 q ha-1e1
Comparator
other weed management practicese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“traditional beushening method proved significantly superior seed yield over other weed management practices (52.5 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield under hand weeding twice (50.8 q ha-1) was at par with the traditional beushening method.

Treatment
hand weeding twicee1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Value
50.8 q ha-1e1
Comparator
traditional beushening methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“traditional beushening method proved significantly superior seed yield over other weed management practices (52.5 q ha-1) was at par with the hand weeding twice (50.8 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–530 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed yield under sequential pre-emergence oxadiargyl fb bispyribac at 25 DAS (50.2 q ha-1) was at par with the traditional beushening method.

Treatment
sequential application pre -emergence oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
at pare1
Value
50.2 q ha-1e1
Comparator
traditional beushening methode1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“traditional beushening method proved significantly superior seed yield over other weed management practices (52.5 q ha-1) was at par with the hand weeding twice (50.8 q ha-1) and sequential application pre -emergence oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DAS (50.2 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–644 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input energy was highest under the biasi method (12.2 MJX103).

Treatment
biasi methode1
Outcome
Input energye1
Direction
higheste1
Value
12.2 MJX103e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Input energy was highest in biasi method (12.2 MJX103)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–699 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input energy under hand weeding was 11.9 MJX103, second to the biasi method.

Treatment
hand weedinge1
Outcome
Input energye1
Value
11.9 MJX103e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Input energy was highest in biasi method (12.2 MJX103) followed by the hand weeding (11.9 MJX103)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 645–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide weed management showed low input energy compared with the biasi method and hand weeding.

Treatment
weed management through herbicidese1
Outcome
input energye1
Direction
lowe1
Comparator
biasi method and hand weedinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“the weed management through herbicides shows low input energy as compared to the biasi method and hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–863 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Input energy was high with the combine harvester compared with manual harvesting.

Treatment
combine harvestere1
Outcome
input energye1
Direction
highe1
Comparator
manual harvesting systeme1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“The input energy was high in combine harvester as compared to manual harvesting system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 865–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum output energy (152.7 MJX103) was recorded under the biasi method, statistically superior to all other treatments.

Treatment
biasi methode1
Outcome
output energye1
Direction
Maximume1
Value
152.7 MJX103e1
Comparator
all the treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Maximum output energy was recorded under the biasi method (152.7 MJX103) which was statistically superior over all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1082 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rate did not influence output energy; 120, 80 and 40 kg ha-1 seed rates gave almost similar output energy.

Treatment
seed ratee1
Outcome
output energye1
Direction
does not influencee1
Qualifier
almost similar output energye2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“During the investigation seed rate does not influence the output energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1084–1155 · show in text ↑
e2

“almost similar output energy was produced by the 120, 80 and 40 kg ha-1 seed rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1160–1241 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum energy use efficiency (9.6) was recorded with pre-emergence oxadiargyl fb bispyribac at 25 DAS on mean basis.

Treatment
oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fbbispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
energy use efficiencye1
Direction
maximume1
Value
9.6e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“The maximum energy use efficiency (9.6) was recorded in withpre–emergence application of oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1fbbispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASon mean basis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1243–1401 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting efficiency through the harvester was less than manual harvesting, but the difference was very marginal in both years.

Treatment
harvesting through harvestere1
Outcome
Efficiency of harvestinge1
Direction
lesse1
Qualifier
the difference was very marginal in both the yearse1
Comparator
manual harvestinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Efficiency of harvesting through harvester was less as compared to the manual harvesting but the difference was very marginal in both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1546 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The harvester reduced human energy in the rice production system.

Treatment
harvestere1
Outcome
human energye1
Direction
reducese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, harvester reduces the human energy in rice production system and promotes the timely operation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The harvester promoted timely operation in rice production.

Treatment
harvestere1
Outcome
timely operatione1
Direction
promotese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“However, harvester reduces the human energy in rice production system and promotes the timely operation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1548–1651 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maximum energy productivity (.44 kg MJ ha-1) was recorded with pre-emergence oxadiargyl fb bispyribac at 25 DAS.

Treatment
pre -emergence application oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1 fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
Energy productivitye1
Direction
maximume1
Value
.44kg MJ ha-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Energy productivity (.44kg MJ ha-1) was recorded maximum in pre -emergence application oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1 fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DAS treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1808 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Energy productivity with pre-emergence oxadiargyl fb bispyribac at 25 DAS was at par with the biasi method and hand weeding.

Treatment
pre -emergence application oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1 fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DASe1
Outcome
Energy productivitye1
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
biasi method and hand weedinge1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“Energy productivity (.44kg MJ ha-1) was recorded maximum in pre -emergence application oxadiargyl 70 g ha-1 fb bispyribac Na @20 g ha-1 at 25 DAS treatment which was at par with biasi method and hand weeding”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1653–1860 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combine harvester energy productivity is high, reflecting more yield per hectare for the input energy spent.

Treatment
combine harvestere1
Outcome
energy productivitye1
Qualifier
production of more yields per hectare by the expenditure of input energye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“High energy productivity in combine harvester reveals the production of more yields per hectare by the expenditure of input energy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1896–2026 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Output input ratio and energy use efficiency were high in the manual harvesting method.

Treatment
manual harvesting methode1
Outcome
output input ratio and energy use efficiencye1
Direction
highe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“direct seeded rice production system”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 145–181 · show in text ↑
e1

“although the output input ratio and energy use efficiency was high in manual harvesting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2028–2122 · show in text ↑

bispyribac · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

density · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

395 papers: 330 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 330 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

391 papers more in this group

See all 395 papers →

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

76 papers in the same direction as this paper · 725 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

798 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.