Abstract
Lentil is an important pulse crop and plays very important role in the supply of the protein to under nourished vegetarian population of the country. Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis is one of the wide spread and destructive diseases in India under rice-based cropping system. Use of synthetic fungicides has led to the emergence of several problems like environment pollution, residual effect in grains and killing of non-target organism(s). Hence, for minimizing the losses caused by Fusarium wilt, four plant extracts such as Garlic, Neem, Eucalyptus, Tulsi and three antagonistic bio-agents viz. Trichoderma viride, Trichoderma harzianum and Pseudomonas fluorescence were evaluated. The disease incidence was not much reducing by Neem (40.50 %) and Tulsi (34.45 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing. The same trends were also found in per cent disease reduction. However, per cent disease reduction in between Eucalyptus (25.50 %) and Garlic (28.00 %), Tulsi (34.45 %) was at par to each other. The Maximum per cent disease reduction was found in Eucalyptus (25.50 %) and Garlic (28.00 %), Lowering the disease incidence and higher per cent disease reduction was also found in Trichoderma viride (19.64 %) as compared to Trichoderma harzianum (35.50 %) and Pseudomonas fluorescence (28.43 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Neem treatment showed 40.50% disease incidence and little disease reduction at 60 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- Lentil
Lens culinarist0 - Treatment
- Neeme0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- not much reducinge0
- Value
- 40.50 %e0
- Qualifier
- 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The disease incidence was not much reducing by Neem (40.50 %) and Tulsi (34.45 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Tulsi treatment showed 34.45% disease incidence and little disease reduction at 60 days after sowing.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Tulsie0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- not much reducinge0
- Value
- 34.45 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The disease incidence was not much reducing by Neem (40.50 %) and Tulsi (34.45 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Eucalyptus treatment was reported at 25.50% disease reduction, at par with Garlic and Tulsi.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Eucalyptuse0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Outcome
- per cent disease reductione0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 25.50 %e0
- Comparator
- Garlice0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“per cent disease reduction in between Eucalyptus (25.50 %) and Garlic (28.00 %), Tulsi (34.45 %) was at par to each other”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Garlic treatment was reported at 28.00% disease reduction, at par with Eucalyptus and Tulsi.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Garlice0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Outcome
- per cent disease reductione0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 28.00 %e0
- Comparator
- Eucalyptuse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“per cent disease reduction in between Eucalyptus (25.50 %) and Garlic (28.00 %), Tulsi (34.45 %) was at par to each other”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma viride lowered wilt incidence to 19.64%, compared with Trichoderma harzianum at 35.50%.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Trichoderma viridee0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Trichoderma viride
Trichoderma viridee0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- Loweringe0
- Value
- 19.64 %e0
- Qualifier
- 35.50 %e0
- Comparator
- Trichoderma harzianume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowering the disease incidence and higher per cent disease reduction was also found in Trichoderma viride (19.64 %) as compared to Trichoderma harzianum (35.50 %) and Pseudomonas fluorescence (28.43 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Pseudomonas fluorescence treatment was reported at 28.43% disease incidence, compared with Trichoderma viride at 19.64%.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Pseudomonas fluorescencee0biocontrol_agent
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Value
- 28.43 %e0
- Comparator
- Trichoderma viridee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Lowering the disease incidence and higher per cent disease reduction was also found in Trichoderma viride (19.64 %) as compared to Trichoderma harzianum (35.50 %) and Pseudomonas fluorescence (28.43 %) at 10 per cent concentration of 60 days after sowing”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
Claim · model-written summary
Trichoderma harzianum treatment was reported at 35.50% disease incidence, compared with Trichoderma viride at 19.64%.
- Taxon
- LentilLens culinarist0
- Treatment
- Trichoderma harzianume0
- Interactor
- Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentisFusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentise1pathogen
- Second interactor
- Trichoderma harzianum
Trichoderma harzianume0biocontrol_agent - Outcome
- Fusarium wilte1
- Value
- 35.50 %e0
- Comparator
- Trichoderma viridee0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Trichoderma viride (19.64 %) as compared to Trichoderma harzianum (35.50 %) and Pseudomonas fluorescence (28.43 %)”
t0“Lentil”
e1“Fusarium wilt of lentil caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis”
The same questions in other papers
Trichoderma viride · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
Trichoderma harzianum · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Allium sativum · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
botanical · Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. lentis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results
5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.