Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effects of sowing dates and spacing on semi rabi green gram

R.A. Gurjar; KV Patel; HP Patel; et al.

7
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the semi rabi seasons of the year 2016 and 2017 at Pulse Research Station, Anand Agricultural University, Model Farm, Vadodara, Gujarat in sandy loam soil. It evaluates the effect of four datesof sowing (1st week of Sept., 3rd week of Sept., 1st week of Oct. and 3rd week of Oct.) and two spacing (30 cm and 45 cm between rows) on growth and yield of green gram. The results revealed that higher number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod Pod length and test weight as well as maximum seed and haulm yield were recorded in the crop sown on 3rd week of Sept., while Plant height and number of branches per plant in 1st week of September. Plant population was not altered due to different dates of sowing. In general narrow spacing (30 cm between rows) record highest grain and straw yield whereas wider spacing of 45 cm between rows produced significantly highest number of branches/plant, pods/plant and test weight. Plant height, number of seeds/pod and Pod length record unaffected due to different spacings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the third week of September gave higher pods, seeds per pod, pod length and test weight.

Treatment
3rd week of Sept.e0
Outcome
number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod Pod length and test weighte0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher number of pods/plant, number of seeds/pod Pod length and test weight as well as maximum seed and haulm yield were recorded in the crop sown on 3rd week of Sept.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the third week of September gave maximum seed and haulm yield.

Treatment
3rd week of Sept.e0
Outcome
seed and haulm yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maximum seed and haulm yield were recorded in the crop sown on 3rd week of Sept.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 516–596 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing in the first week of September gave the highest plant height and branch count.

Treatment
1st week of Septembere0
Outcome
Plant height and number of branches per plante0
Direction
highere1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height and number of branches per plant in 1st week of September”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–674 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“higher number of pods/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–456 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sowing date did not alter plant population.

Treatment
different dates of sowinge0
Outcome
Plant populatione0
Direction
not alterede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant population was not altered due to different dates of sowing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–741 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Narrow 30 cm row spacing gave the highest grain and straw yield.

Treatment
narrow spacing (30 cm between rows)e0
Outcome
grain and straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
45 cm between rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“narrow spacing (30 cm between rows) record highest grain and straw yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–826 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“wider spacing of 45 cm between rows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wider 45 cm row spacing gave significantly highest branches, pods and test weight.

Treatment
45 cm between rowse0
Outcome
number of branches/plant, pods/plant and test weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
30 cm between rowse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wider spacing of 45 cm between rows produced significantly highest number of branches/plant, pods/plant and test weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑
e1

“narrow spacing (30 cm between rows)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 754–789 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spacing did not affect plant height, seeds per pod or pod length.

Treatment
different spacingse0
Outcome
Plant height, number of seeds/pod and Pod lengthe0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Plant height, number of seeds/pod and Pod length record unaffected due to different spacings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 956–1048 · show in text ↑
t0

“green gram”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 49–59 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 45 positive, 9 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.