Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Biofertilizers formulations and their effect on morphological characters in greengram (Vigna radiata L.)

K. Shravani; S. Triveni; PC Latha; et al.

5
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The investigations to evaluate the effect of different formulations of biofertilizers on plant growth parameters of Greengram, variety (MGG –295) and the field experiment was conducted at water technology centre fields, college farm, College of Agriculture, PJTSAU, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, Telangana during kharif 2016 – 2017. From the results, the plant height and Dry matter production at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stage respectively (27.40, 39.00, 46.33, 47.07 cm) and (8.60, 15.80, 22.30 and 18.30 g plant-1 ) significantly increased in seed treatment with liquid based bio fertilizers with combination of 100 % RDF and LBBF Seed treatment when compared to all other treatments. The significantly highest root length of greengram was noticed due to combined seed treatment with carrier based Rhizobium and PSB bio-inoculants at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stage was recorded 12.63, 17.60, 22.83 and 23.50 cm respectively. The soil treatment with LBBF along with 100 % RDF application recorded significantly highest number of root nodules and nodule dry weight i.e. (18) and (30) nodules plant-1 and 0.18 and 0.30 nodule dry weight g plant-1 at 30 and 45 DAS respectively when compared to all other treatments. These results provide baseline information to promote an eco-friendly and sustainable agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Liquid biofertilizer seed treatment with full RDF increased greengram height at four stages.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Organ / stage
30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stagee0
Treatment
seed treatment with liquid based bio fertilizers with combination of 100 % RDF and LBBF Seed treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede0
Value
27.40, 39.00, 46.33, 47.07 cme0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results, the plant height and Dry matter production at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stage respectively (27.40, 39.00, 46.33, 47.07 cm) and (8.60, 15.80, 22.30 and 18.30 g plant-1 ) significantly increased in seed treatment with liquid based bio fertilizers with combination of 100 % RDF and LBBF Seed treatment when compared to all other treatments.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 334–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The same treatment increased greengram dry matter production at four stages.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
seed treatment with liquid based bio fertilizers with combination of 100 % RDF and LBBF Seed treatmente0
Outcome
Dry matter productione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
8.60, 15.80, 22.30 and 18.30 g plant-1e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Dry matter production at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stage respectively (27.40, 39.00, 46.33, 47.07 cm) and (8.60, 15.80, 22.30 and 18.30 g plant-1 ) significantly increased in seed treatment with liquid based bio fertilizers with combination of 100 % RDF and LBBF Seed treatment when compared to all other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–688 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Carrier based Rhizobium and PSB seed treatment gave the highest greengram root length.

Treatment
combined seed treatment with carrier based Rhizobium and PSB bio-inoculantse0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.63, 17.60, 22.83 and 23.50 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The significantly highest root length of greengram was noticed due to combined seed treatment with carrier based Rhizobium and PSB bio-inoculants at 30, 45, 60 DAS and at harvest stage was recorded 12.63, 17.60, 22.83 and 23.50 cm respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–933 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil LBBF with full RDF produced the highest root nodule counts at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil treatment with LBBF along with 100 % RDF applicatione0
Outcome
number of root nodulese0
Direction
higheste0
Value
(18) and (30) nodules plant-1e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil treatment with LBBF along with 100 % RDF application recorded significantly highest number of root nodules and nodule dry weight i.e. (18) and (30) nodules plant-1 and 0.18 and 0.30 nodule dry weight g plant-1 at 30 and 45 DAS respectively when compared to all other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil LBBF with full RDF produced the highest nodule dry weight at 30 and 45 DAS.

Taxon
greengram (Vigna radiata L.)Vigna radiatat0
Treatment
soil treatment with LBBF along with 100 % RDF applicatione0
Outcome
nodule dry weighte0
Direction
higheste0
Value
0.18 and 0.30 nodule dry weight g plant-1e0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata
Vigna radiata · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil treatment with LBBF along with 100 % RDF application recorded significantly highest number of root nodules and nodule dry weight i.e. (18) and (30) nodules plant-1 and 0.18 and 0.30 nodule dry weight g plant-1 at 30 and 45 DAS respectively when compared to all other treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1221 · show in text ↑
t0

“greengram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–104 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Results agree

53 papers: 53 positive, 0 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 52 positive, 2 negative or no effect

51 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

seed treatment · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

56 papers: 53 positive, 3 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

52 papers more in this group

See all 56 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

69 papers: 67 positive, 2 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

fertilization · growth · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 140 positive, 5 negative or no effect

139 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.