Paper · 2020 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of tillage and nutrient management practices on banded leaf and sheath blight of Maize

B. C. Sharma; Rajesh P. Singh; Amit Bhatnagar

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Banded leaf and sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani fsp sasakii is highly destructive diseases of maize crop worldwide including India. Depending upon weather conditions they cause the significant yield reduction ranging from 11 to 40 % in maize crop. It is present in all tropical and temperate maize growing regions. Growing conditions creating hot and humid condition are most favourable for the development of the disease. Under tarai condition of Uttrakhand an experiment was carried out by integrating tillage practices like- permanent raised beds, zero tillage and conventional tillage along with different nutrient management approaches like- Recommended Dose of Fertilizers (RDF), Site Spesific Nutrient management (SSNM) and Farmer’s practices (FP) for the management of maize diseases. Results of present study indicated that conventional tillage followed by permanent raised bed and zero tillage and in nutrient management SSNM followed by RDF management practices were found equally good with respect to diseases incidence and severity. Highest grain yield was recorded in permanent raised beds (5817 Kg/ha) while conventional tillage (5748 Kg/ha) was found at par with permanent raised beds. Minimum yield was recorded in zero tillage (5617 Kg/ha). Thousand grain weight in conventional tillage (306 g) and permanent beds (305 g) were at par, followed by zero tillage (282 g).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage, followed by permanent raised beds and zero tillage, gave the best disease incidence and severity results.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Interactor
Rhizoctonia solani fsp sasakiiRhizoctonia solanie0pathogen
Outcome
diseases incidence and severitye1
Direction
equally goode1
Comparator
zero tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizoctonia solani
Rhizoctonia solani · Interactoranonimowy, niektóre prawa zastrzeżone (CC BY) · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e1

“conventional tillage followed by permanent raised bed and zero tillage and in nutrient management SSNM followed by RDF management practices were found equally good with respect to diseases incidence and severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 844–1056 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banded leaf and sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani fsp sasakii is highly destructive diseases of maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SSNM followed by RDF gave comparably good disease incidence and severity results.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
SSNMe1
Outcome
diseases incidence and severitye1
Direction
equally goode1
Comparator
RDFe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“SSNM followed by RDF management practices were found equally good with respect to diseases incidence and severity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1056 · show in text ↑
e0

“Banded leaf and sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani fsp sasakii is highly destructive diseases of maize crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–115 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Permanent raised beds had the highest grain yield, 5817 Kg/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
permanent raised bedse1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
Higheste1
Value
5817 Kg/hae1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Highest grain yield was recorded in permanent raised beds (5817 Kg/ha) while conventional tillage (5748 Kg/ha) was found at par with permanent raised beds.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1057–1212 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of tillage and nutrient management practices on banded leaf and sheath blight of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zero tillage had the lowest grain yield at 5617 Kg/ha.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
zero tillagee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
Minimume1
Value
5617 Kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Minimum yield was recorded in zero tillage (5617 Kg/ha).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of tillage and nutrient management practices on banded leaf and sheath blight of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thousand-grain weight was 306 g under conventional tillage, 305 g in permanent beds, and 282 g under zero tillage.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee1
Outcome
Thousand grain weighte1
Direction
at pare1
Value
306 ge1
Comparator
permanent bedse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Thousand grain weight in conventional tillage (306 g) and permanent beds (305 g) were at par, followed by zero tillage (282 g).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1397 · show in text ↑
t0

“Effect of tillage and nutrient management practices on banded leaf and sheath blight of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–93 · show in text ↑

fertilization · disease · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

84 papers: 56 positive, 28 negative or no effect

55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
    Conventionally treated fields had more Diplodia stalk rot.

    Maize Yields and Soil Nutrient Levels With and Without Pesticides and Standard Commercial Fertilizers1 · 1980 · compared with no herbicides, insecticides, or standard commercial fertilizers

    Opposite direction

80 papers more in this group

See all 84 papers →

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this paper · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,095 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.