Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Productivity, profitability, energetics and nutrient uptake of post kharif rice-cowpea preceded by rice varieties grown under different establishment methods

Pravamanjari Giri; Basudev Behera; Amit Mishra; et al.

11
claims
17
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agronomy Main Research Farm, Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, OUAT, Bhubaneswar, Odisha during of 2014-15 and 2015-16 to evaluate the productivity, profitability, energetics and nutrient uptake of post kharif rice-cowpea preceded by rice varieties grown in kharif under different establishment methods. The treatments comprising three establishment methods (Direct Seeded Rice, Non Puddled Transplanted Rice and Puddled Transplanted rice) and three variety/hybrids of rice (‘Arize 6129’, ‘Arize 6444’ and ‘Swarna’) were tried in split plot design with three replications. The Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR) recorded the maximum rice equivalent yield (8.43 t ha-1) for post kharif rice-cowpea which was at par with NPTR (8.34 t ha-1) and the minimum of 6.85 t ha-1 was recorded under Direct Seeded Rice (DSR). The total cowpea biomass yield was the maximum under NPTR and the minimum under DSR. The maximum gross return of 1,20,380/-, total energy output of 2,25,045 MJ ha-1 and energy use efficiency of 8.59 was recorded under PTR, NPTR and DSR, respectively. Uptake of nitrogen was higher under NPTR while phosphorus and potassium uptake values were higher under PTR. The rice cultivar/hybrids grown in kharif had no significant effect on yield, economics, energetics and uptake of nutrient, but hybrid ‘Arize 6129’ recorded higher mean values than hybrid ‘Arize 6444’ and cv. ‘Swarna’.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR) gave maximum rice equivalent yield.

Taxon
rice-cowpeae0
Treatment
Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR)e0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.43 t ha-1e0
Comparator
NPTRe0

Verbatim

e0

“The Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR) recorded the maximum rice equivalent yield (8.43 t ha-1) for post kharif rice-cowpea which was at par with NPTR (8.34 t ha-1) and the minimum of 6.85 t ha-1 was recorded under Direct Seeded Rice (DSR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Direct Seeded Rice (DSR) gave minimum rice equivalent yield.

Taxon
rice-cowpeae0
Treatment
Direct Seeded Rice (DSR)e0
Outcome
rice equivalent yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Value
6.85 t ha-1e0
Comparator
Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR)e0

Verbatim

e0

“The Puddled Transplanted Rice (PTR) recorded the maximum rice equivalent yield (8.43 t ha-1) for post kharif rice-cowpea which was at par with NPTR (8.34 t ha-1) and the minimum of 6.85 t ha-1 was recorded under Direct Seeded Rice (DSR).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 623–860 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPTR gave maximum total cowpea biomass yield.

Treatment
NPTRe0
Outcome
total cowpea biomass yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Comparator
DSRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total cowpea biomass yield was the maximum under NPTR and the minimum under DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR gave minimum total cowpea biomass yield.

Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
total cowpea biomass yielde0
Direction
minimume0
Comparator
NPTRe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total cowpea biomass yield was the maximum under NPTR and the minimum under DSR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 861–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PTR gave maximum gross return.

Taxon
rice-cowpeat0
Treatment
PTRe0
Outcome
gross returne0
Direction
maximume0
Value
1,20,380/-e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross return of 1,20,380/-, total energy output of 2,25,045 MJ ha-1 and energy use efficiency of 8.59 was recorded under PTR, NPTR and DSR, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPTR gave maximum total energy output.

Taxon
rice-cowpeat0
Treatment
NPTRe0
Outcome
total energy outpute0
Direction
maximume0
Value
2,25,045 MJ ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross return of 1,20,380/-, total energy output of 2,25,045 MJ ha-1 and energy use efficiency of 8.59 was recorded under PTR, NPTR and DSR, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DSR gave maximum energy use efficiency.

Taxon
rice-cowpeat0
Treatment
DSRe0
Outcome
energy use efficiencye0
Direction
maximume0
Value
8.59e0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum gross return of 1,20,380/-, total energy output of 2,25,045 MJ ha-1 and energy use efficiency of 8.59 was recorded under PTR, NPTR and DSR, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1111 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPTR gave higher Uptake of nitrogen.

Taxon
rice-cowpeat0
Treatment
NPTRe0
Outcome
Uptake of nitrogene0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of nitrogen was higher under NPTR while phosphorus and potassium uptake values were higher under PTR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PTR gave higher phosphorus and potassium uptake.

Taxon
rice-cowpeat0
Treatment
PTRe0
Outcome
phosphorus and potassium uptakee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Uptake of nitrogen was higher under NPTR while phosphorus and potassium uptake values were higher under PTR.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1220 · show in text ↑
t0

“rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

rice cultivar/hybrids gave no significant effect yield, economics, energetics and uptake of nutrient.

Treatment
rice cultivar/hybridse0
Outcome
yield, economics, energetics and uptake of nutriente0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice cultivar/hybrids grown in kharif had no significant effect on yield, economics, energetics and uptake of nutrient, but hybrid ‘Arize 6129’ recorded higher mean values than hybrid ‘Arize 6444’ and cv. ‘Swarna’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1439 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Arize 6129 had higher mean values than Arize 6444 and Swarna.

Material
Arize 6129e0
Outcome
mean valuese0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
Swarnae0
Comparator
Arize 6444e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“hybrid ‘Arize 6129’ recorded higher mean values than hybrid ‘Arize 6444’ and cv. ‘Swarna’”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1349–1438 · show in text ↑
t0

“post kharif rice-cowpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑

Oryza sativa · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 6 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

transplanting · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.