Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Growth and Yield of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn.) as Influenced by Intercropping with Pulses

Dhimmagudi Ramamohan Reddy; P. Shalini Pillai; Jacob John; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A study was conducted at Integrated Farming System Research Station, Karamana, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, to assess the effect of intercropping in finger millet and to assess the effect of AMF on the growth and yield of finger millet. The field experiment was laid out in randomized block design with 11 treatments replicated thrice. The treatments comprised finger millet (with and without AMF) intercropped with pulses, viz., green gram, black gram and cowpea along with the sole crop of all the above crops. The results elicited that both AMF and intercropping had significant effect on the growth and yield of finger millet. The sole crop of finger millet with AMF was found to show superior growth and yield attributes of finger millet. Among the intercropping systems, finger millet (with AMF) + cowpea was found to excel in the growth and yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AMF significantly affected finger millet growth and yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield of finger millete1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“both AMF and intercropping had significant effect on the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercropping significantly affected finger millet growth and yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
intercroppinge1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield of finger millete1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“both AMF and intercropping had significant effect on the growth and yield of finger millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–628 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sole finger millet with AMF had superior growth and yield attributes.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
sole crop of finger millet with AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
growth and yield attributes of finger millete1
Direction
superiore1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“The sole crop of finger millet with AMF was found to show superior growth and yield attributes of finger millet.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 630–742 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among intercrops, finger millet with AMF and cowpea excelled in growth and yield.

Taxon
finger milletEleusine coracanae1
Treatment
finger millet (with AMF) + cowpeae1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Second interactor
cowpeaVigna unguiculatae1other
Outcome
growth and yielde1
Direction
excele1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Eleusine coracana
Eleusine coracana · TaxonAgnieszka Kwiecień, Nova · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · Second interactorHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Finger Millet”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–33 · show in text ↑
e1

“Among the intercropping systems, finger millet (with AMF) + cowpea was found to excel in the growth and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–853 · show in text ↑

Vigna unguiculata · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

intercropping · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results

32 papers: 29 positive, 3 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

28 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.