Abstract
Field experiments were conducted at the Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu during kharif and rabi seasons of 2000-2003 under rainfed condition. The treatments included raising greengram or cowpea for vegetable/grain purpose and utilization of haulms as fodder as well for incorporation alongwith fallow (no pulse crop). For the second season crop of finger millet, the above treatments were kept as main plot treatments with the subplot treatments of either transplanting or direct sowing of finger millet with and without phosphorus. Results of the study revealed that maximum green fodder production and yield were obtained in cowpea as compared to greengram. In succeeding finger millet crop, higher grain and straw yield and net return were obtained when cowpea was incorporated in the early season followed by transplanting of finger millet with P application.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 2
Claim · model-written summary
Cowpea gave maximum green fodder production and yield compared with greengram.
- Taxon
- cowpea
Vigna unguiculatae0 - Treatment
- cowpeae0
- Outcome
- green fodder production and yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- greengrame0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“maximum green fodder production and yield were obtained in cowpea as compared to greengram”
Claim · model-written summary
In the succeeding finger millet crop, cowpea incorporated early and followed by transplanting with P gave higher grain and straw yield and net return.
- Taxon
- finger millet
Eleusine coracanae1 - Organ / stage
- grain and strawe1
- Treatment
- cowpea was incorporated in the early season followed by transplanting of finger millet with P applicatione1
- Outcome
- grain and straw yield and net returne1
- Direction
- highere1
- Setting
- rainfed conditione2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“higher grain and straw yield and net return were obtained when cowpea was incorporated in the early season followed by transplanting of finger millet with P application”
e2“Field experiments were conducted at the Department of Agronomy, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu during kharif and rabi seasons of 2000-2003 under rainfed condition”
The same questions in other papers
Vigna unguiculata · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
6 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →transplanting · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →phosphorus · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Positive and negative results
36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
35 papers more in this group
See all 39 papers →climate site · yield · Eleusine coracana (finger millet)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.