Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Effect of Chemical Fertilizer, Organic Manure and Biofertilizer on Nodulation, Yield and Economics of Lentil (Lens culinaris L. Medik.)

Emmanuel Sonkarlay; Edwin Luikham; Herojit Singh Athokpam

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the rabi season of 2019-2020 to study the “Influence of Integrated Phosphorus Management on the Growth, Yield and Quality of Lentil (Lens culinaris L. Medik.)”. The soil of the experimental field was clay in texture with pH of 5.54 and organic carbon content of 0.8%. The minimum and maximum temperatures recorded during the period under review were 10.3 and 24.5oC with a total rainfall of 246.4 mm and average sunshine of 8.6 hours respectively. The experiment was laid out in Randomized Block Design with three replications. There were nine treatments which consisted of different sole and combined application of phosphorus, organic manure and Biophos. It was observed that application of 75% RDP + FYM @ 5 t/ha + Biophos @ 20 ml/kg seed (T4) proved significantly superior to all the treatments in terms of all parameters viz nodule number (61.0), fresh and dry weight of nodule (36.0 and 26.0 mg), number of pods per plant (164.30), number of seeds per pod (2.57), seed and stover yield (15.50 and 19.03 q/ha). The highest gross income (Rs. 118500 /ha) and net return (Rs. 82510 /ha) were also associated with the treatment T4. However, T4 and T1 exhibited similar B:C ratio of 3.29. The treatment T4 showed significant enhancement of post-harvest soil nutrient status.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave the highest nodule number of 61.0.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDP + FYM @ 5 t/ha + Biophos @ 20 ml/kg seed (T4)e0
Outcome
nodule numbere0
Direction
superiore0
Value
61.0e0
Comparator
all the treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 75% RDP + FYM @ 5 t/ha + Biophos @ 20 ml/kg seed (T4) proved significantly superior to all the treatments in terms of all parameters viz nodule number (61.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave fresh nodule weight of 36.0 mg.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
75% RDP + FYM @ 5 t/ha + Biophos @ 20 ml/kg seed (T4)e1
Outcome
fresh and dry weight of nodulee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
36.0e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh and dry weight of nodule (36.0 and 26.0 mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 75% RDP + FYM @ 5 t/ha + Biophos @ 20 ml/kg seed (T4) proved significantly superior to all the treatments in terms of all parameters viz nodule number (61.0)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 718–890 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave dry nodule weight of 26.0 mg.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
dry weight of nodulee0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
26.0 mge0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fresh and dry weight of nodule (36.0 and 26.0 mg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 892–941 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave 164.30 pods per plant.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
number of pods per plante0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
164.30e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of pods per plant (164.30)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 943–976 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave 2.57 seeds per pod.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
number of seeds per pode0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
2.57e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“number of seeds per pod (2.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 978–1008 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave seed yield of 15.50 q/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
seed and stover yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
15.50e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and stover yield (15.50 and 19.03 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 gave stover yield of 19.03 q/ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
19.03 q/hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“seed and stover yield (15.50 and 19.03 q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1010–1054 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest gross income of Rs. 118500 /ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
gross incomee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
Rs. 118500 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest gross income (Rs. 118500 /ha) and net return (Rs. 82510 /ha) were also associated with the treatment T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 produced the highest net return of Rs. 82510 /ha.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste2
Value
Rs. 82510 /hae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“net return (Rs. 82510 /ha) were also associated with the treatment T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1171 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
e2

“The highest gross income (Rs. 118500 /ha) and net return (Rs. 82510 /ha) were also associated with the treatment T4”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1056–1171 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 and T1 had a similar benefit-to-cost ratio of 3.29.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
similare0
Value
3.29e0
Comparator
T1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T4 and T1 exhibited similar B:C ratio of 3.29”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1182–1227 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T4 significantly enhanced postharvest soil nutrient status.

Taxon
LentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
T4e0
Outcome
post-harvest soil nutrient statuse0
Direction
enhancemente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The treatment T4 showed significant enhancement of post-harvest soil nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1229–1313 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 102–108 · show in text ↑

fertilization · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.