Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rhizobium and PSB with nutrient amendments significantly enhanced lentil nodulation.

A claim from Integrated nutrient management for high productivity and net returns in lentil (Lens culinaris) · 2017

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium and PSB with nutrient amendments significantly enhanced lentil nodulation.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) along with recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), farmyard manure (FYM) and vermicomposte0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB)e0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nodulation was significantly (P?0.01) enhanced in treatments comprising of Rhizobium and phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) along with recommended dose of fertilizer (RDF), farmyard manure (FYM) and vermicompost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 144–358
t0

“lentil (Lens culinaris)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–95

Title

Integrated nutrient management for high productivity and net returns in lentil (Lens culinaris)

Guriqbal Singh; Harpreet Kaur Virk; Veena Khanna Journal of Applied and Natural Science 2017. doi:10.31018/jans.v9i3.1402

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-8b4f217d522b7c8e097888799eb57d9f9cdcaf4742e9ee62438dd4aa25231c8b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 16 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 18 positive, 1 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.