Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter significantly improved lentil number of nodules to 68.6/plant at full fertilizer dose.

A claim from INFLUENCE OF AZOTOBACTER AND IAA ON SYMBIOTIC PERFORMANCE OF RHIZOBIUM AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF LENTIL · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter significantly improved lentil number of nodules to 68.6/plant at full fertilizer dose.

Taxon
LENTILLens culinarist0
Treatment
co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobactere0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Outcome
number of nodulese0
Direction
excellede0
Value
68.6/plante0
Qualifier
full dose of fertilizere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageComparatorSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Data showed that co-inoculation of Rhizobium and Azotobacter significantly excelled in biomass (27.67g/pot), number of nodules (68.6/plant), nodular mass (1.95 g/plant), root length (39 cm), shoot length (26.3cm), root weight (7.2 g/pot) and shoot weight (6.8g/pot) at full dose of fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–628
t0

“LENTIL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–101

Title

INFLUENCE OF AZOTOBACTER AND IAA ON SYMBIOTIC PERFORMANCE OF RHIZOBIUM AND YIELD PARAMETERS OF LENTIL

Naseem Akhtar; M. J. Ahmad 2012

Other claims from this paper (19)

Record rev-db41b5cfe13bae476f5d77707de92a3d019fe1c31d0293663ff6934dc57277bf · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.