Paper · 2016 · Acta Phytopathologica et Entomologica Hungarica

Management of Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina by Graphene Oxide on Lens culinaris

J. A. Guroo; M. Khan; A. Ahmad; et al.

14
claims
42
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment. Treatment of plants with 10 ml solution of GO with 125, 250 and 500 ppm concentration caused a significant increase in plant dry weight over control. Inoculation of plants with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant reduction in plant dry weight over uninoculated control. Treatment of plants with 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO and subsequent inoculation with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant increase in plant dry weight over plants inoculated without GO pretreatment. Treatment of 500 ppm GO caused a greater increase in plant dry weight of M. incognita or M. phaseolina inoculated plants followed by 250 ppm and 125 ppm. Numbers of nodules per root system were high in plants without pathogen. Inoculation of M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused reduction in nodulation. However, treatment of GO in all the three concentrations had no significant effect on nodulation in plants both with and without pathogens. Treatment of GO resulted in reduced galling, nematode multiplication and root-rot index. Greater reduction in galling, nematode multiplication and root-rot index were observed in plants treated with 500 ppm GO followed by 250 ppm and 125 ppm. Indices were reduced to 4, 3 and 2, respectively, when plants with M. phaseolina were treated with 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO. This study shows that the use of GO is useful for the management of M. incognita and M. phaseolina on lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide at 125, 250 and 500 ppm significantly increased lentil dry weight.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
10 ml solution of GO with 125, 250 and 500 ppm concentratione0
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of plants with 10 ml solution of GO with 125, 250 and 500 ppm concentration caused a significant increase in plant dry weight over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 143–292 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita inoculation significantly reduced lentil dry weight.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
Inoculation of plants with M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant reduction in plant dry weight over uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

M. phaseolina inoculation significantly reduced lentil dry weight.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
M. phaseolinae0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
reductione0
Comparator
uninoculated controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of plants with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant reduction in plant dry weight over uninoculated control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 293–427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide pretreatment increased dry weight of M. incognita inoculated lentil plants.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
125, 250 and 500 ppm GOe0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
plants inoculated without GO pretreatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of plants with 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO and subsequent inoculation with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant increase in plant dry weight over plants inoculated without GO pretreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide pretreatment increased dry weight of M. phaseolina inoculated lentil plants.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
125, 250 and 500 ppm GOe0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
plants inoculated without GO pretreatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of plants with 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO and subsequent inoculation with M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused a significant increase in plant dry weight over plants inoculated without GO pretreatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 428–636 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight increase was greatest at 500 ppm graphene oxide, followed by 250 and 125 ppm.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
500 ppm GOe0
Outcome
plant dry weighte0
Direction
greater increasee0
Comparator
250 ppm and 125 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of 500 ppm GO caused a greater increase in plant dry weight of M. incognita or M. phaseolina inoculated plants followed by 250 ppm and 125 ppm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 637–790 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plants without pathogen had high nodule numbers.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Outcome
Numbers of nodules per root systeme0
Direction
highe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Numbers of nodules per root system were high in plants without pathogen.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 791–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. incognita inoculation reduced lentil nodulation.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
Inoculation of M. incognitae0
Interactor
M. incognitaMeloidogyne incognitae0pest
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Meloidogyne incognita
Meloidogyne incognita · InteractorPhoto by William Wergin and Richard Sayre. Colorized by Stephen Ausmus. U.S. Department of Agriculture · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused reduction in nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

M. phaseolina inoculation reduced lentil nodulation.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
M. phaseolinae0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of M. incognita or M. phaseolina caused reduction in nodulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–940 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide had no significant effect on nodulation with or without pathogens.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
GO in all the three concentrationse0
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
no significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment of GO in all the three concentrations had no significant effect on nodulation in plants both with and without pathogens.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1080 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide reduced galling.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
GOe0
Outcome
gallinge0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of GO resulted in reduced galling, nematode multiplication and root-rot index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide reduced nematode multiplication.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
GOe0
Outcome
nematode multiplicatione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of GO resulted in reduced galling, nematode multiplication and root-rot index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graphene oxide reduced root-rot index.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
GOe0
Outcome
root-rot indexe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of GO resulted in reduced galling, nematode multiplication and root-rot index.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1169 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO, root-rot indices with M. phaseolina were 4, 3 and 2, respectively.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarise1
Treatment
125, 250 and 500 ppm GOe0
Interactor
M. phaseolinaMacrophomina phaseolinae0pathogen
Outcome
Indicese0
Direction
reducede0
Value
4, 3 and 2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Macrophomina phaseolina
Macrophomina phaseolina · InteractorEdward L. Barnard, Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services · CC BY 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Indices were reduced to 4, 3 and 2, respectively, when plants with M. phaseolina were treated with 125, 250 and 500 ppm GO.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1447 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lens culinaris”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–99 · show in text ↑
e1

“Effect of Graphene oxide (GO) was observed on Meloidogyne incognita and Macrophomina phaseolina and on the growth of lentil in pot experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–142 · show in text ↑

Meloidogyne incognita · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Macrophomina phaseolina · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Meloidogyne incognita · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.