Paper · 2023 · Frontiers in Plant Science

Non-rhizobial nodule endophytes improve nodulation, change root exudation pattern and promote the growth of lentil, for prospective application in fallow soil

Sourav Debnath; Subhradeep Chakraborty; Mrinalini Langthasa; et al.

19
claims
40
verbatim quotes
40
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Non-rhizobial endophytes (NREs) are active colonizers inhabiting the root nodules. Though their active role in the lentil agroecosystem is not well defined, here we observed that these NREs might promote the growth of lentils, modulate rhizospheric community structure and could be used as promising organisms for optimal use of rice fallow soil. NREs from root nodules of lentils were isolated and examined for plant growth-promoting traits, exopolysaccharide (EPS) and biofilm production, root metabolites, and the presence of nifH and nifK elements. The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed that both isolates could successfully colonize the roots and elicit root hair growth. The inoculation of the NREs resulted in specific changes in root exudation patterns. The plants with 33GS and R6 treatment significantly stimulated the exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids, and their methyl esters in comparison to the uninoculated plants, altering the rhizospheric microbial community structure. Proteobacteria dominated the rhizospheric microbiota in all the treatments. Treatment with 33GS or R6 also enhanced the relative abundance of other favourable microbes, including Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium. The correlation network analysis of relative abundances resulted in numerous bacterial taxa, which were in cooperation with each other, having a possible role in plant growth promotion. The results indicate the significant role of NREs as plant growth promoters, which also includes their role in root exudation patterns, enhancement of soil nutrient status and modulation of rhizospheric microbiota, suggesting their prospects in sustainable, and bio-based agriculture.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 19

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS increased germination rate and vigour index of lentils

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
germination rate, vigour indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS increased fresh weight of lentil nodules by 94%

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
fresh weight of nodulese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
94%e1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS increased lentil shoot length by 86%

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
length of the shoote1
Direction
increasede1
Value
86%e1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS increased development of lentil nodules in non-sterile soil

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
development of nodulese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in non-sterile soile1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS increased chlorophyll levels of lentils

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll levelse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 increased germination rate and vigour index of lentils

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
germination rate, vigour indexe1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 increased fresh weight of lentil nodules by 61%

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
fresh weight of nodulese1
Direction
increasede1
Value
61%e1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 increased lentil shoot length by 51.16%

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
length of the shoote1
Direction
increasede1
Value
51.16%e1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 increased development of lentil nodules in non-sterile soil

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
development of nodulese1
Direction
increasede1
Qualifier
in non-sterile soile1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 increased chlorophyll levels of lentils

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
chosen NREse1
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
chlorophyll levelse1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
uninoculated controle1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS colonized lentil roots and elicited root hair growth

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Interactor
Serratia plymuthica 33GSSerratia plymuthicae1symbiont
Outcome
colonize the rootse2
Qualifier
elicit root hair growthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Serratia plymuthica
Serratia plymuthica · InteractorAlexis López Hernández · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
e2

“Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed that both isolates could successfully colonize the roots and elicit root hair growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1058 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 colonized lentil roots and elicited root hair growth

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Interactor
Serratia sp. R6e1symbiont
Outcome
colonize the rootse2
Qualifier
elicit root hair growthe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e1

“The greenhouse experiment with the chosen NREs, i.e., Serratia plymuthica 33GS and Serratia sp. R6 significantly increased the germination rate, vigour index, development of nodules (in non-sterile soil) and fresh weight of nodules (33GS 94%, R6 61% growth) and length of the shoot (33GS 86%, R6 51.16%) as well as chlorophyll levels when compared to the uninoculated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–928 · show in text ↑
e2

“Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) revealed that both isolates could successfully colonize the roots and elicit root hair growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 930–1058 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS stimulated exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids and their methyl esters by lentil plants

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
33GSe3
Interactor
33GSe3symbiont
Outcome
exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids, and their methyl esterse3
Direction
stimulatede3
Comparator
uninoculated plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e3

“The plants with 33GS and R6 treatment significantly stimulated the exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids, and their methyl esters in comparison to the uninoculated plants, altering the rhizospheric microbial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 stimulated exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids and their methyl esters by lentil plants

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
R6e3
Interactor
R6e3symbiont
Outcome
exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids, and their methyl esterse3
Direction
stimulatede3
Comparator
uninoculated plantse3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e3

“The plants with 33GS and R6 treatment significantly stimulated the exudation of triterpenes, fatty acids, and their methyl esters in comparison to the uninoculated plants, altering the rhizospheric microbial community structure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1145–1372 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia plymuthica 33GS enhanced relative abundance of Rhizobium and Mesorhizobium in lentil rhizosphere

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
33GSe4
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume4symbiont
Second interactor
MesorhizobiumMesorhizobiume4symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of other favourable microbese4
Direction
enhancede4
Qualifier
and Bradyrhizobiume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment with 33GS or R6 also enhanced the relative abundance of other favourable microbes, including Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1597 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Serratia sp. R6 enhanced relative abundance of Rhizobium and Mesorhizobium in lentil rhizosphere

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Treatment
R6e4
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume4symbiont
Second interactor
MesorhizobiumMesorhizobiume4symbiont
Outcome
relative abundance of other favourable microbese4
Direction
enhancede4
Qualifier
and Bradyrhizobiume4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Mesorhizobium
Mesorhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e4

“Treatment with 33GS or R6 also enhanced the relative abundance of other favourable microbes, including Rhizobium, Mesorhizobium, and Bradyrhizobium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1597 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proteobacteria dominated the lentil rhizospheric microbiota in all treatments

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Outcome
Proteobacteriae5
Qualifier
in all the treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e5

“Proteobacteria dominated the rhizospheric microbiota in all the treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1448 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Numerous bacterial taxa in the lentil rhizosphere were in cooperation with each other in the correlation network

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Outcome
bacterial taxae6
Qualifier
which were in cooperation with each othere6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e6

“The correlation network analysis of relative abundances resulted in numerous bacterial taxa, which were in cooperation with each other, having a possible role in plant growth promotion”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1599–1783 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Non-rhizobial nodule endophytes enhance soil nutrient status of lentil fields

Taxon
lentilsLens culinarise0
Outcome
enhancement of soil nutrient statuse7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“promote the growth of lentils”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 196–225 · show in text ↑
e7

“enhancement of soil nutrient status”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1921–1956 · show in text ↑

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 31 positive, 5 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.