Abstract
The application of beneficial microorganisms can enhance the growth of crops and increase their yields. In this context, we analysed the growth and development responses of six legume species inoculated by the mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus" in greenhouse conditions. The effect of inoculation by Symbion VAM on legumes growth and development depends on the species and the cultivar used. A significant increase of shoot fresh weight, number of nodules and root dry weight was observed in common bean, pea and alfalfa, respectively. The most positive effect of inoculation was observed with the A17 Medicago truncatula line, which showed an increase in shoot and root dry weights, in nodule and pod numbers, and an early blooming. However, chickpea and lentil inoculated plants didn't show any increase for all measured growth and development traits. This positive effect of inoculation on A17 line by the Symbion VAM biofertilizer was associated with important mycorrhiza root colonization (21 to 40%) in comparison to the other legume cultivars at 50 days post inoculation. This study suggests that the success of inoculation with mycorrhiza-based inoculants depends on several factors including the density of inoculants in infective propagules and the length of legume life cycle.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Common bean shoot fresh weight increased significantly after inoculation.
- Taxon
- common bean
Phaseolus vulgarise1 - Treatment
- mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus"e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- shoot fresh weighte1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculated by the mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus" in greenhouse conditions”
e1“A significant increase of shoot fresh weight, number of nodules and root dry weight was observed in common bean, pea and alfalfa, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pea nodule number increased significantly after inoculation.
- Taxon
- pea
Lathyrus oleraceuse1 - Treatment
- mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus"e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- number of nodulese1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculated by the mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus" in greenhouse conditions”
e1“A significant increase of shoot fresh weight, number of nodules and root dry weight was observed in common bean, pea and alfalfa, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Alfalfa root dry weight increased significantly after inoculation.
- Taxon
- alfalfa
Medicago sativae1 - Treatment
- mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus"e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- root dry weighte1
- Direction
- increasee1
- Setting
- greenhouse conditionse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculated by the mycorrhiza-based bio-fertilizer "Stanes Symbion VAM Plus" in greenhouse conditions”
e1“A significant increase of shoot fresh weight, number of nodules and root dry weight was observed in common bean, pea and alfalfa, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated A17 Medicago truncatula had increased shoot and root dry weights.
- Taxon
- Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatulae1
- Material
- A17e1
- Treatment
- inoculation by Symbion VAMe0
- Interactor
- Symbion VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- shoot and root dry weightse1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation by Symbion VAM”
e1“The most positive effect of inoculation was observed with the A17 Medicago truncatula line, which showed an increase in shoot and root dry weights, in nodule and pod numbers, and an early blooming.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated A17 Medicago truncatula had increased nodule and pod numbers.
- Taxon
- Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatulae1
- Material
- A17e1
- Treatment
- inoculation by Symbion VAMe0
- Interactor
- Symbion VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- nodule and pod numberse1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation by Symbion VAM”
e1“The most positive effect of inoculation was observed with the A17 Medicago truncatula line, which showed an increase in shoot and root dry weights, in nodule and pod numbers, and an early blooming.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated A17 Medicago truncatula bloomed early.
- Taxon
- Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatulae1
- Material
- A17e1
- Treatment
- inoculation by Symbion VAMe0
- Interactor
- Symbion VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- early bloominge1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“inoculation by Symbion VAM”
e1“The most positive effect of inoculation was observed with the A17 Medicago truncatula line, which showed an increase in shoot and root dry weights, in nodule and pod numbers, and an early blooming.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated chickpea showed no increase in measured growth and development traits.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinume1 - Treatment
- inoculation by Symbion VAMe0
- Interactor
- Symbion VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and development traitse1
- Direction
- didn't show any increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculation by Symbion VAM”
e1“chickpea and lentil inoculated plants didn't show any increase for all measured growth and development traits”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated lentil showed no increase in measured growth and development traits.
- Taxon
- lentil
Lens culinarise1 - Treatment
- inoculation by Symbion VAMe0
- Interactor
- Symbion VAMe0symbiont
- Outcome
- growth and development traitse1
- Direction
- didn't show any increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“inoculation by Symbion VAM”
e1“chickpea and lentil inoculated plants didn't show any increase for all measured growth and development traits”
Claim · model-written summary
A17 root colonization reached 21 to 40% at 50 days after inoculation, compared with other cultivars.
- Taxon
- Medicago truncatula
Medicago truncatulae1
- Material
- A17e0
- Interactor
- mycorrhizae0symbiont
- Outcome
- mycorrhiza root colonizatione0
- Direction
- importante0
- Value
- 21 to 40%e0
- Qualifier
- 50 days post inoculatione0
- Comparator
- the other legume cultivarse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A17 line by the Symbion VAM biofertilizer was associated with important mycorrhiza root colonization (21 to 40%) in comparison to the other legume cultivars at 50 days post inoculation”
e1“A17 Medicago truncatula line”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest inoculation success depends on infective propagule density and legume life-cycle length.
Verbatim
e0“the success of inoculation with mycorrhiza-based inoculants depends on several factors including the density of inoculants in infective propagules and the length of legume life cycle”
The same questions in other papers
mycorrhiza · growth · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Medicago truncatula (barrel medic)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ
44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
51 papers more in this group
See all 55 papers →inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · symbiosis · Medicago truncatula (barrel medic)Positive and negative results
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →inoculation · growth · Medicago truncatula (barrel medic)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
18 papers more in this group
See all 22 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.