Paper · 2011 · The Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Potential for enhancing lentil (Lens culinaris) productivity by co-inoculation with PSB, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria and Rhizobium

Veena Khanna; Poonam Sharma

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
19
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Rhizobia in association with a legume host have the exceptional ability to form root nodules. Free living microorganisms, especially the plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria are known to promote Rhizobium efficiency by different mechanisms. Field experiments were conducted to assess the effect of co-inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viciae, phosphorus-solubilizing bacteria and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on symbiotic parameters, growth and yield of lentil. Seeds of lentil (Lens culinaris Medikus) variety LL 699 were treated with the three inoculants singly and in combination and sown following randomized block design in three replications. Results revealed that PGPR with rhizobial inoculation enhanced nodulation, growth and yield (19.8nodules/plant, 70.6mg nodule dry weight/plant, 1 605kg/ ha) as compared to Rhizobium alone (17.8nodules/plant, 64.3mg/plant and 1 546kg/ha resp.) and non-inoculated control (13.9nodules/plant, 47.7mg/plant and 1 401kg/ha resp.). Treatment comprising Rhizobium +PSB was found to be at par with Rhizobium inoculation alone in terms of nodulation and yield. However, the response was more prominent when all the three microorganisms were applied in combination, higher nodule biomass (16.7%) and yield (5%) was recorded over that with Rhizobium inoculation alone. Although PSB alone did not show any positive effect on symbiotic parameters and yield, however in conjunction it seemed to assert a synergistic effect. The results imply that co-inoculation with Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR is a beneficial approach for improving the nodulation, growth and yield of lentil.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR plus Rhizobium increased lentil nodulation relative to Rhizobium alone and uninoculated control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
PGPR with rhizobial inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodulatione0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
19.8nodules/plante0
Comparator
Rhizobium alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that PGPR with rhizobial inoculation enhanced nodulation, growth and yield (19.8nodules/plant, 70.6mg nodule dry weight/plant, 1 605kg/ ha) as compared to Rhizobium alone (17.8nodules/plant, 64.3mg/plant and 1 546kg/ha resp.) and non-inoculated control (13.9nodules/plant, 47.7mg/plant and 1 401kg/ha resp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR plus Rhizobium increased lentil nodule dry weight/plant relative to Rhizobium alone and uninoculated control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
PGPR with rhizobial inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodule dry weight/plante0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
70.6mg nodule dry weight/plante0
Comparator
Rhizobium alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that PGPR with rhizobial inoculation enhanced nodulation, growth and yield (19.8nodules/plant, 70.6mg nodule dry weight/plant, 1 605kg/ ha) as compared to Rhizobium alone (17.8nodules/plant, 64.3mg/plant and 1 546kg/ha resp.) and non-inoculated control (13.9nodules/plant, 47.7mg/plant and 1 401kg/ha resp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PGPR plus Rhizobium increased lentil yield relative to Rhizobium alone and uninoculated control.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
PGPR with rhizobial inoculatione0
Interactor
PGPRe0symbiont
Second interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
1 605kg/ hae0
Comparator
Rhizobium alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that PGPR with rhizobial inoculation enhanced nodulation, growth and yield (19.8nodules/plant, 70.6mg nodule dry weight/plant, 1 605kg/ ha) as compared to Rhizobium alone (17.8nodules/plant, 64.3mg/plant and 1 546kg/ha resp.) and non-inoculated control (13.9nodules/plant, 47.7mg/plant and 1 401kg/ha resp.).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 666–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rhizobium plus PSB matched Rhizobium alone for lentil nodulation and yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
Rhizobium +PSBe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
nodulation and yielde0
Direction
at pare0
Comparator
Rhizobium inoculation alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment comprising Rhizobium +PSB was found to be at par with Rhizobium inoculation alone in terms of nodulation and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1117 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-way inoculation gave 16.7% higher lentil nodule biomass than Rhizobium alone.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
all the three microorganisms were applied in combinatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
nodule biomasse0
Direction
highere0
Value
16.7%e0
Comparator
Rhizobium inoculation alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the response was more prominent when all the three microorganisms were applied in combination, higher nodule biomass (16.7%) and yield (5%) was recorded over that with Rhizobium inoculation alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three-way inoculation gave 5% higher lentil yield than Rhizobium alone.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
all the three microorganisms were applied in combinatione0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
5%e0
Comparator
Rhizobium inoculation alonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, the response was more prominent when all the three microorganisms were applied in combination, higher nodule biomass (16.7%) and yield (5%) was recorded over that with Rhizobium inoculation alone.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1118–1323 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB alone showed no positive effect on lentil symbiotic parameters or yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
PSB alonee0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
symbiotic parameters and yielde0
Direction
did not show any positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although PSB alone did not show any positive effect on symbiotic parameters and yield, however in conjunction it seemed to assert a synergistic effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PSB in conjunction with other inoculants appeared synergistic for lentil response.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
synergistic effecte0
Qualifier
in conjunctione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Although PSB alone did not show any positive effect on symbiotic parameters and yield, however in conjunction it seemed to assert a synergistic effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1324–1475 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR co-inoculation to improve lentil nodulation, growth and yield.

Taxon
lentilLens culinarist0
Treatment
co-inoculation with Rhizobium, PSB and PGPRe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Second interactor
PSBe0symbiont
Outcome
improving the nodulation, growth and yield of lentile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lens culinaris
Lens culinaris · TaxonUser:Justinc · CC BY-SA 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results imply that co-inoculation with Rhizobium, PSB and PGPR is a beneficial approach for improving the nodulation, growth and yield of lentil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1476–1625 · show in text ↑
t0

“lentil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 24–30 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

15 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

inoculation · yield · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results differ

69 papers: 65 positive, 4 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

inoculation · symbiosis · Lens culinaris (lentil)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

inoculation · Rhizobium · Lens culinaris (lentil)Results agree

12 papers: 12 positive, 0 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.