Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences

Studies on the Site Specific Nutrient Management Practices for Balanced Fertilization in Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)

M. Velmurugan; L. Pugalendhi; S. Manickam; et al.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Cassava is an important tuber crop cultivated in Tamil Nadu. Being a long duration crop, judicious application of nutrients is important for getting higher tuber yield. In Tamil Nadu, invariably of the soil nutrient status, the blanket fertilizer recommendation is 90: 90: 240 kg of NPK/ha. A field experiment was conducted at Tapioca and Castor Research Station, Yethapur under AICRP Tuber crops Programme to study the site specific nutrient recommendations for cassava in red non calcareous soil (Typic Rhodustalf, Irrugur series) on the growth, tuber yield and starch content of cassava. The cassava variety Sree Vijaya was planted in ridges and furrows at a spacing of 90 x 75 cm. Based on the initial availability of nutrients, the experiment was planned with six treatments in Randomized Block Design (RBD) with four replications. The varying doses of fertilizers was compared with the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha). The final soil sample was collected during the time of harvest of the crop. The results of the experiment revealed that the tallest plants (54.22, 106.97, 142.96 and 187.65 cm) and maximum number of leaves (40.00, 110.00, 132.00 and 119.66) was recorded in 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th months after planting in site specific based nutrient application (115:50:35 kg NPK/ha) respectively. The differential application of nutrients influenced the tuber yield. The mean tuber yield of 36.89 t ha-1 was recorded by the application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/ha. However, the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) recorded the lowest weight of stem (0.72 kg), weight of tuber (1.35 kg plant-1) and mean tuber yield (13.94 t ha-1). Based on the experimental results, precise and balanced application of fertilizers can be achieved with maximum tuber yield and starch content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site specific nutrient application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/ha gave the tallest cassava plants at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after planting (54.22, 106.97, 142.96 and 187.65 cm).

Treatment
site specific based nutrient application (115:50:35 kg NPK/ha)e0
Outcome
tallest plantse0
Direction
talleste0
Value
54.22, 106.97, 142.96 and 187.65 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tallest plants (54.22, 106.97, 142.96 and 187.65 cm) and maximum number of leaves (40.00, 110.00, 132.00 and 119.66) was recorded in 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th months after planting in site specific based nutrient application (115:50:35 kg NPK/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Site specific nutrient application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/ha gave the maximum number of leaves at 2, 4, 6 and 8 months after planting (40.00, 110.00, 132.00 and 119.66).

Treatment
site specific based nutrient application (115:50:35 kg NPK/ha)e0
Outcome
maximum number of leavese0
Direction
maximume0
Value
40.00, 110.00, 132.00 and 119.66e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the tallest plants (54.22, 106.97, 142.96 and 187.65 cm) and maximum number of leaves (40.00, 110.00, 132.00 and 119.66) was recorded in 2nd, 4th, 6th and 8th months after planting in site specific based nutrient application (115:50:35 kg NPK/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1048–1294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Differential application of nutrients influenced cassava tuber yield.

Treatment
differential application of nutrientse0
Outcome
tuber yielde0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The differential application of nutrients influenced the tuber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1377 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/ha gave a mean cassava tuber yield of 36.89 t ha-1.

Treatment
application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/hae0
Outcome
mean tuber yielde0
Value
36.89 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean tuber yield of 36.89 t ha-1 was recorded by the application of 115:50:35 kg NPK/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1470 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) gave the lowest stem weight, 0.72 kg.

Treatment
the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
weight of steme0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.72 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) recorded the lowest weight of stem (0.72 kg), weight of tuber (1.35 kg plant-1) and mean tuber yield (13.94 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) gave the lowest tuber weight, 1.35 kg per plant.

Treatment
the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
weight of tubere0
Direction
loweste0
Value
1.35 kg plant-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) recorded the lowest weight of stem (0.72 kg), weight of tuber (1.35 kg plant-1) and mean tuber yield (13.94 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) gave the lowest mean tuber yield, 13.94 t ha-1.

Treatment
the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha)e0
Outcome
mean tuber yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
13.94 t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the farmers practice (90:70:280 kg/ha) recorded the lowest weight of stem (0.72 kg), weight of tuber (1.35 kg plant-1) and mean tuber yield (13.94 t ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1481–1635 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that precise and balanced fertilizer application can achieve maximum tuber yield and starch content in cassava.

Treatment
precise and balanced application of fertilizerse0
Outcome
maximum tuber yield and starch contente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“precise and balanced application of fertilizers can be achieved with maximum tuber yield and starch content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1672–1779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 89–123 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

71 papers: 65 positive, 6 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

140 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

climate site · growth · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.