Paper · 2007

Complementary Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Application: Influence on Growth and Yield of Cassava/maize/melon Intercrop with a Relayed Cowpea.

O. T. Ayoola; Emmanuel Ayobami Makinde

7
claims
8
verbatim quotes
59
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The need for judicious management of resources and conservation of soil under intensive cropping has become major areas of agronomic research. This study was therefore carried out to compare the effects of complementary and sole applications of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the growth and yield of cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpea. It was a randomized complete block design experiment. Organic fertilizer (Poultry manure + decomposed urban refuse (1:1 by weight) was applied at 5 t / ha / year. Inorganic fertilizer (NPK 15-15-15) was applied at 400 kg/ha. The complementary application was 200 kg/ha N PK 15-15-15 + 2.5 t/ha/year poultry manure + decomposed urban refuse (1:1 by weight).There was also the no fertilizer control treatment. Results showed that maize performed best in terms of growth and yield with complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizers. Melon yield under the various fertilizer treatments did not differ statistically in both years. Cassava root yield with complementary application was comparable with yield from sole inorganic fertilizer treatment in the first year of experimentation when sole organic fertilizer had a significantly lower yield. By the second year however, yields under the various fertilizer treatments were statistically similar. Cowpea yield was significantly higher with complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizers than from sole organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments. Complementary application of 200 kg/ha NPK 15-15-15 with 2.5 t/ha/year poultry manure + decomposed urban refuse (1:1 by weight) is therefore recommended for sustaining the cultivation of cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Complementary inorganic and organic fertilizer gave the best maize growth and yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maize performed best in terms of growth and yield with complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 787–904 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon yield did not differ statistically among fertilizer treatments in either year.

Taxon
MelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
various fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Melon yield under the various fertilizer treatments did not differ statistically in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1001 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, cassava root yield under complementary fertilizer was comparable to sole inorganic fertilizer.

Treatment
complementary applicatione0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
comparablee0
Qualifier
first year of experimentatione0
Comparator
sole inorganic fertilizer treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava root yield with complementary application was comparable with yield from sole inorganic fertilizer treatment in the first year of experimentation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1155 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

In the first year, sole organic fertilizer produced significantly lower cassava root yield.

Treatment
sole organic fertilizere0
Outcome
root yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
first year of experimentatione0
Comparator
complementary applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cassava root yield with complementary application was comparable with yield from sole inorganic fertilizer treatment in the first year of experimentation when sole organic fertilizer had a significantly lower yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1216 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

By the second year, cassava yields were statistically similar across fertilizer treatments.

Treatment
various fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
similare0
Qualifier
second yeare0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Manihot esculenta
Manihot esculenta · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“By the second year however, yields under the various fertilizer treatments were statistically similar.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1218–1320 · show in text ↑
e1

“Cassava root yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1020 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Complementary inorganic and organic fertilizer gave significantly higher cowpea yield than either sole fertilizer.

Treatment
complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizerse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
sole organic and inorganic fertilizer treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cowpea yield was significantly higher with complementary application of inorganic and organic fertilizers than from sole organic and inorganic fertilizer treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1486 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend complementary NPK and organic manure/refuse for sustaining the cassava, maize, melon and cowpea intercrop.

Taxon
cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpeae0
Treatment
Complementary application of 200 kg/ha NPK 15-15-15 with 2.5 t/ha/year poultry manure + decomposed urban refuse (1:1 by weight)e0
Outcome
sustaining the cultivatione0

Verbatim

e0

“Complementary application of 200 kg/ha NPK 15-15-15 with 2.5 t/ha/year poultry manure + decomposed urban refuse (1:1 by weight) is therefore recommended for sustaining the cultivation of cassava/maize/melon intercrop with a relayed cowpea.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1487–1726 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

fertilization · yield · Manihot esculenta (cassava)Positive and negative results

153 papers: 141 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 141 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

149 papers more in this group

See all 153 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

292 papers: 275 positive, 17 negative or no effect

274 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

288 papers more in this group

See all 292 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.