Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Melon yield did not differ statistically among fertilizer treatments in either year.

A claim from Complementary Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Application: Influence on Growth and Yield of Cassava/maize/melon Intercrop with a Relayed Cowpea. · 2007

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Melon yield did not differ statistically among fertilizer treatments in either year.

Taxon
MelonCucumis meloe0
Treatment
various fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
did not differe0
Qualifier
both yearse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Melon yield under the various fertilizer treatments did not differ statistically in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 906–1001

Title

Complementary Organic and Inorganic Fertilizer Application: Influence on Growth and Yield of Cassava/maize/melon Intercrop with a Relayed Cowpea.

O. T. Ayoola; Emmanuel Ayobami Makinde 2007

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-e184484b9754555cfd8aace1208114e30b51ad84200c8367c9ed3d0a508331a9 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

fertilization · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

95 papers: 72 positive, 23 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 72 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.