Paper · 2020 · The Journal of Basic and Applied Zoology

Perforation index assessment of cowpea seeds against cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus (Fabricius) [Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae], infestation using Piper guineense

Kayode David Ileke; Jacobs Mobolade Adesina; Luke Chinaru Nwosu; et al.

16
claims
29
verbatim quotes
12
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract Background Powders and extracts of Piper guineense seeds and leaves were assessed for insecticidal activities against Callosobruchus maculatus in the laboratory at temperature and relative humidity of 29.6 °C and 75.9%, respectively. Bioactive compounds in P . guineense leaves and seeds were also investigated. The powders were tested at rates 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds while extracts were tested at 1.0, 2.0 and 3.0%. Results Results of contact toxicity assay of the seed powder caused 100% adult mortality at 96 h post-treatment period whereas leaf powder evoked 90% adult mortality within the same period at concentration of 1.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds. Low adult emergence was observed on cowpea seeds treated with 1 g of seed powder with percentage adult emergence of 10.0% and inhibition rate (IR) of 97.5%. Beetle Perforation Index (BPI) obtained from treated cowpea seeds was significantly different ( P < 0.05) from BPI of untreated seeds. Extracts of P . guineense seed were more toxic than seed powder. Piper guineense seed extract caused 87.5% adult mortality of C . maculatus while leaf extract caused 70.0% adult mortality within 24 h of infestation at concentration of 1%. Progeny development of C . maculatus was completely inhibited in cowpea treated with 2% and 3% leaf and seed extracts of P . guineense . β-Pinene was the most abundant active compound in P . guineense seed (55.6%) and leaf (48.4%). β-Phellandrene occurred 38.2% in seeds while Ocimene had the least value of 0.2% in seed and 0.5% in leaf. Conclusion The study showed that P . guineense seed powder and extracts were more effective than leaf powder and extract. Utilization of plant products as alternative to synthetic insecticides in protecting cowpea seeds against C . maculatus should be encouraged for enhanced food safety and security. Piper guineense is used as spice and medicine and interestingly safe for human use.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense seed powder at 1.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds caused 100% adult bruchid mortality at 96 hours.

Treatment
seed powdere1
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult mortalitye1
Direction
causede1
Value
100%e1
Qualifier
96 h post-treatment periode1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea seeds against cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“The powders were tested at rates 1.0, 2.0 and 4.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 321–390 · show in text ↑
e1

“seed powder caused 100% adult mortality at 96 h post-treatment period”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 489–558 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense leaf powder caused 90% adult bruchid mortality at 1.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds after 96 hours.

Treatment
leaf powdere0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult mortalitye0
Direction
evokede0
Value
90%e0
Qualifier
1.0 g/20 g cowpea seedse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf powder evoked 90% adult mortality within the same period at concentration of 1.0 g/20 g cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 567–672 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seeds treated with 1 g seed powder had 10.0% adult bruchid emergence.

Treatment
1 g of seed powdere0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult emergencee0
Direction
Lowe0
Value
10.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Low adult emergence was observed on cowpea seeds treated with 1 g of seed powder with percentage adult emergence of 10.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–795 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cowpea seeds treated with 1 g seed powder had a 97.5% inhibition rate of adult bruchid emergence.

Treatment
1 g of seed powdere0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
inhibition rate (IR)e0
Value
97.5%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“cowpea seeds treated with 1 g of seed powder with percentage adult emergence of 10.0% and inhibition rate (IR) of 97.5%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 710–829 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treated cowpea seeds differed significantly from untreated seeds in Beetle Perforation Index.

Treatment
treated cowpea seedse0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
Beetle Perforation Index (BPI)e0
Comparator
untreated seedse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Beetle Perforation Index (BPI) obtained from treated cowpea seeds was significantly different ( P < 0.05) from BPI of untreated seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 831–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense seed extract was more toxic to bruchids than seed powder.

Treatment
Extracts of P . guineense seede0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
toxice0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
seed powdere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Extracts of P . guineense seed were more toxic than seed powder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 966–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense seed extract caused 87.5% Callosobruchus maculatus adult mortality.

Treatment
Piper guineense seed extracte0
Interactor
C . maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
adult mortality of C . maculatuse0
Direction
causede0
Value
87.5%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–44 · show in text ↑
e0

“Piper guineense seed extract caused 87.5% adult mortality of C . maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1105 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense leaf extract caused 70.0% adult bruchid mortality within 24 hours at 1%.

Treatment
leaf extracte0
Interactor
Callosobruchus maculatusCallosobruchus maculatust0pest
Outcome
adult mortalitye0
Direction
causede0
Value
70.0%e0
Qualifier
within 24 h of infestation at concentration of 1%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cowpea bruchid, Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 53–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“leaf extract caused 70.0% adult mortality within 24 h of infestation at concentration of 1%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1112–1203 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two percent Piper guineense leaf extract completely inhibited Callosobruchus maculatus progeny development in cowpea.

Treatment
2% and 3% leaf and seed extracts of P . guineensee0
Interactor
C . maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
Progeny development of C . maculatuse0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Callosobruchus maculatus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–93 · show in text ↑
e0

“Progeny development of C . maculatus was completely inhibited in cowpea treated with 2% and 3% leaf and seed extracts of P . guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1339 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three percent Piper guineense leaf extract completely inhibited Callosobruchus maculatus progeny development in cowpea.

Treatment
3% leaf and seed extracts of P . guineensee0
Interactor
C . maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
Progeny development of C . maculatuse0
Direction
completely inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Progeny development of C . maculatus was completely inhibited in cowpea treated with 2% and 3% leaf and seed extracts of P . guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1205–1339 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense seed contained β-Pinene as the most abundant active compound, at 55.6%.

Taxon
P . guineensePiper guineensee0
Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
β-Pinene was the most abundant active compounde0
Value
55.6%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper guineense
Piper guineense · TaxonJi-Elle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β-Pinene was the most abundant active compound in P . guineense seed (55.6%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1418 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Piper guineense leaves contained β-Pinene as the most abundant active compound, at 48.4%.

Taxon
P . guineensePiper guineensee0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
β-Pinene was the most abundant active compounde0
Value
48.4%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper guineense
Piper guineense · TaxonJi-Elle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“β-Pinene was the most abundant active compound in P . guineense seed (55.6%) and leaf (48.4%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1342–1435 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

β-Phellandrene constituted 38.2% of Piper guineense seeds.

Taxon
Piper guineensePiper guineenset0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
β-Phellandrenee0
Value
38.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper guineense
Piper guineense · TaxonJi-Elle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Piper guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“β-Phellandrene occurred 38.2% in seeds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1475 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimene was least abundant in Piper guineense seeds at 0.2%.

Taxon
Piper guineensePiper guineenset0
Organ / stage
seede0
Outcome
Ocimenee0
Value
0.2%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper guineense
Piper guineense · TaxonJi-Elle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Piper guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ocimene had the least value of 0.2% in seed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1525 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ocimene was present in Piper guineense leaves at 0.5%.

Taxon
Piper guineensePiper guineenset0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
Ocimenee0
Value
0.5%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Piper guineense
Piper guineense · TaxonJi-Elle · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Piper guineense”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 153–168 · show in text ↑
e0

“Ocimene had the least value of 0.2% in seed and 0.5% in leaf”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1542 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend plant products to protect cowpea seeds against Callosobruchus maculatus.

Interactor
C . maculatusCallosobruchus maculatuse0pest
Outcome
Utilization of plant products as alternative to synthetic insecticides in protecting cowpea seeds against C . maculatuse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna unguiculata
Vigna unguiculata · TaxonHeraldDesa at English Wikipedia · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Callosobruchus maculatus
Callosobruchus maculatus · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryOriginality1988 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Utilization of plant products as alternative to synthetic insecticides in protecting cowpea seeds against C . maculatus should be encouraged for enhanced food safety and security”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1666–1844 · show in text ↑

Piper guineense · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 9 positive, 1 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

botanical · Callosobruchus maculatus · Vigna unguiculata (cowpea)Positive and negative results

163 papers: 158 positive, 5 negative or no effect

157 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

159 papers more in this group

See all 163 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.