Abstract
An experiment was conducted with the objective of ascertaining the feasibility of cultivation of pigeonpea during rabi season in the alfisols of Southern Telangana Zone. Further, it was designed to understand the performance of pigeonpea genotypes at various plant densities and also the economics of pigeonpea cultivation during rabi season. It consisted of 12 treatments with four plant densities in main plots and three genotypes in sub plots in split plot design. The pooled data of 2015-16 and 2016-17 revealed that significantly higher seed yield (1532 kg ha-1) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at 45cm × 10cm (1332 kg/ha), 75 cm × 10 cm (1321 kg/ha) and 90 cm × 10 cm (1141 kg/ha). Among the genotypes, the seed yield in PRG-158 (1547 kg/ha) and Asha (ICPL 87119) (1591 kg/ha) was on par with each other but significantly higher than in PRG-176 (857 kg/ha). The higher gross returns (Rs. 77366 ha-1), net returns (Rs.46733 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.53) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at other tested plant densities (45 cm × 10 cm, 75 cm × 10 cm and 90 cm × 10 cm). Among the genotypes, Asha (ICPL 87119) registered highest gross returns (Rs. 80346 ha-1), net returns (Rs.49711 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.62) followed by PRG-158 (gross returns of Rs. 78124ha-1, net returns of Rs.47489 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 2.55) and PRG-176 (gross returns of Rs. 43279ha-1, net returns of Rs.13144 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 1.44). Thus, the spacing of 60 cm × 10 cm is recommended for the cultivation of pigeonpea during rabi season in alfisols of Southern Telangana Zone with long duration varieties like PRG-158 and Asha (ICPL-87119).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Spacing of 60 cm × 10 cm produced higher seed yield than three other spacings.
- Taxon
- Pigeonpea
Cajanus cajant0 - Treatment
- 60 cm × 10 cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1532 kg ha-1e0
- Comparator
- 45cm × 10cme0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“significantly higher seed yield (1532 kg ha-1) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at 45cm × 10cm (1332 kg/ha), 75 cm × 10 cm (1321 kg/ha) and 90 cm × 10 cm (1141 kg/ha)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-158 and Asha had similar seed yields, each higher than PRG-176.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-158e0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the seed yield in PRG-158 (1547 kg/ha) and Asha (ICPL 87119) (1591 kg/ha) was on par with each other but significantly higher than in PRG-176 (857 kg/ha)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
60 cm × 10 cm spacing had higher gross returns of Rs. 77366 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 60 cm × 10 cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs. 77366 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other tested plant densitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher gross returns (Rs. 77366 ha-1), net returns (Rs.46733 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.53) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at other tested plant densities (45 cm × 10 cm, 75 cm × 10 cm and 90 cm × 10 cm).”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
60 cm × 10 cm spacing had higher net returns of Rs.46733 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 60 cm × 10 cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- Rs.46733 ha-1e0
- Comparator
- other tested plant densitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher gross returns (Rs. 77366 ha-1), net returns (Rs.46733 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.53) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at other tested plant densities (45 cm × 10 cm, 75 cm × 10 cm and 90 cm × 10 cm).”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
60 cm × 10 cm spacing had higher benefit cost ratio of 2.53.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Treatment
- 60 cm × 10 cm spacinge0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 2.53e0
- Comparator
- other tested plant densitiese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The higher gross returns (Rs. 77366 ha-1), net returns (Rs.46733 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.53) was recorded at plant density of 60 cm × 10 cm spacing than at other tested plant densities (45 cm × 10 cm, 75 cm × 10 cm and 90 cm × 10 cm).”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Asha (ICPL 87119) had gross returns of Rs. 80346 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- Asha (ICPL 87119)e0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Value
- Rs. 80346 ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Asha (ICPL 87119) registered highest gross returns (Rs. 80346 ha-1), net returns (Rs.49711 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.62)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Asha (ICPL 87119) had net returns of Rs.49711 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- Asha (ICPL 87119)e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Value
- Rs.49711 ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Asha (ICPL 87119) registered highest gross returns (Rs. 80346 ha-1), net returns (Rs.49711 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.62)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
Asha (ICPL 87119) had benefit cost ratio of 2.62.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- Asha (ICPL 87119)e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 2.62e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Asha (ICPL 87119) registered highest gross returns (Rs. 80346 ha-1), net returns (Rs.49711 ha-1) and benefit cost ratio (2.62)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-158 had gross returns of Rs. 78124ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-158e0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Value
- Rs. 78124ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-158 (gross returns of Rs. 78124ha-1, net returns of Rs.47489 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 2.55)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-158 had net returns of Rs.47489 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-158e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Value
- Rs.47489 ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-158 (gross returns of Rs. 78124ha-1, net returns of Rs.47489 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 2.55)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-158 had benefit cost ratio of 2.55.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-158e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 2.55e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-158 (gross returns of Rs. 78124ha-1, net returns of Rs.47489 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 2.55)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-176 had gross returns of Rs. 43279ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-176e0
- Outcome
- gross returnse0
- Value
- Rs. 43279ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-176 (gross returns of Rs. 43279ha-1, net returns of Rs.13144 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 1.44)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-176 had net returns of Rs.13144 ha-1.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-176e0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Value
- Rs.13144 ha-1e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-176 (gross returns of Rs. 43279ha-1, net returns of Rs.13144 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 1.44)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
PRG-176 had benefit cost ratio of 1.44.
- Taxon
- PigeonpeaCajanus cajant0
- Material
- PRG-176e0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Value
- 1.44e0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“PRG-176 (gross returns of Rs. 43279ha-1, net returns of Rs.13144 ha-1 and benefit cost ratio of 1.44)”
t0“Pigeonpea”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommended 60 cm × 10 cm spacing with PRG-158 or Asha for rabi cultivation.
- Taxon
- pigeonpeaCajanus cajane0
- Outcome
- spacing of 60 cm × 10 cm is recommendede0
- Setting
- Southern Telangana Zonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the spacing of 60 cm × 10 cm is recommended for the cultivation of pigeonpea during rabi season in alfisols of Southern Telangana Zone with long duration varieties like PRG-158 and Asha (ICPL-87119)”
The same questions in other papers
density · yield · Cajanus cajan (pigeon pea)Positive and negative results
48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
48 papers more in this group
See all 52 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.