Abstract
A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the production potential, their energetics and economics of effi- cient cropping systems under different nutrient management practices during 201112 and 201213. The treat- ments consisted of 3 cropping systems [groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)onion (Allium cepa L.), groundnut wheat [Triticum aestivum (L.) emend. Fiori & Paol.] and groundnutchickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)] with 4 nutrient management treatments, viz. recommended dose of fertilizer, fertilizer dose as per soil test, fertilizer dose as per soil test crop response (STCR) equations and control as main-plot treatments, whereas 3 fertilizer levels, viz. RDF, 75% RDF and 50% RDF as sub-plots treatments. Among the cropping systems, groundnutonion cropping system recorded significantly maximum groundnut equivalent yield (7.82 t/ha), production efficiency (35.1 kg/ha/ day) and economic efficiency ( 842.4/ha/day) than rest of the cropping systems. However, groundnutchickpea (0.82 t/ha) recorded significantly higher protein than groundnutwheat but at par with groundnutonion, while car- bohydrates (5.41 t/ha) and fats (0.81 t/ha) were registered higher with groundnutonion cropping system. Applica- tion of fertilizer as per STCR equation to preceding groundnut registered significantly higher protein (0.95 t/ha), carbohydrate (4.20 t/ha) and fat (0.88 t/ha) than control treatments. Similarly, groundnutonion cropping system obtained significantly maximum net monetary returns ( 188.1103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.98), but ground- nutchickpea cropping system registered significantly higher energy output-input ratio (9.54), energy balance/unit input (8.85) and energy intensiveness (2.59 MJ/ ) on pooled mean. At the end of the 2 years cropping cycles, groundnutonion cropping system found to be most efficient and suitable for obtaining the maximum productivity and monetary returns with application of fertilizer as per STCR equation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion had the highest groundnut equivalent yield.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system recorded significantly maximum groundnut equivalent yield (7.82 t/ha), production efficiency (35.1 kg/ha/ day) and economic efficiency ( 842.4/ha/day) than rest of the cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion had the highest production efficiency.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system recorded significantly maximum groundnut equivalent yield (7.82 t/ha), production efficiency (35.1 kg/ha/ day) and economic efficiency ( 842.4/ha/day) than rest of the cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion had the highest economic efficiency.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system recorded significantly maximum groundnut equivalent yield (7.82 t/ha), production efficiency (35.1 kg/ha/ day) and economic efficiency ( 842.4/ha/day) than rest of the cropping systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutchickpea had higher protein output than groundnutwheat and was at par with groundnutonion.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutchickpea (0.82 t/ha) recorded significantly higher protein than groundnutwheat but at par with groundnutonion”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion had higher carbohydrate output.
Verbatim
e0“car- bohydrates (5.41 t/ha) and fats (0.81 t/ha) were registered higher with groundnutonion cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion had higher fat output.
Verbatim
e0“car- bohydrates (5.41 t/ha) and fats (0.81 t/ha) were registered higher with groundnutonion cropping system”
Claim · model-written summary
STCR-based fertilizer application to preceding groundnut increased protein output versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae0 - Treatment
- fertilizer as per STCR equatione0
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.95 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applica- tion of fertilizer as per STCR equation to preceding groundnut registered significantly higher protein (0.95 t/ha), carbohydrate (4.20 t/ha) and fat (0.88 t/ha) than control treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
STCR-based fertilizer application to preceding groundnut increased carbohydrate output versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- fertilizer as per STCR equatione0
- Outcome
- carbohydratee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4.20 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applica- tion of fertilizer as per STCR equation to preceding groundnut registered significantly higher protein (0.95 t/ha), carbohydrate (4.20 t/ha) and fat (0.88 t/ha) than control treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
STCR-based fertilizer application to preceding groundnut increased fat output versus control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
- Treatment
- fertilizer as per STCR equatione0
- Outcome
- fate0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 0.88 t/hae0
- Comparator
- control treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Applica- tion of fertilizer as per STCR equation to preceding groundnut registered significantly higher protein (0.95 t/ha), carbohydrate (4.20 t/ha) and fat (0.88 t/ha) than control treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion yielded maximum net monetary returns.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system obtained significantly maximum net monetary returns ( 188.1103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.98)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutonion yielded the maximum benefit cost ratio.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system obtained significantly maximum net monetary returns ( 188.1103/ha) and benefit: cost ratio (2.98)”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutchickpea had higher energy output-input ratio.
Verbatim
e0“ground- nutchickpea cropping system registered significantly higher energy output-input ratio (9.54), energy balance/unit input (8.85) and energy intensiveness (2.59 MJ/ ) on pooled mean”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutchickpea had higher energy balance per unit input.
Verbatim
e0“ground- nutchickpea cropping system registered significantly higher energy output-input ratio (9.54), energy balance/unit input (8.85) and energy intensiveness (2.59 MJ/ ) on pooled mean”
Claim · model-written summary
Groundnutchickpea had higher energy intensiveness.
Verbatim
e0“ground- nutchickpea cropping system registered significantly higher energy output-input ratio (9.54), energy balance/unit input (8.85) and energy intensiveness (2.59 MJ/ ) on pooled mean”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend groundnutonion with STCR-based fertilization for maximum productivity and monetary returns.
Verbatim
e0“groundnutonion cropping system found to be most efficient and suitable for obtaining the maximum productivity and monetary returns with application of fertilizer as per STCR equation”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · quality: protein · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- positive
59 papers more in this group
See all 63 papers →fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
5 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
2 papers more in this group
See all 6 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.