Paper · 2024 · Indian Journal of Agronomy

Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management

P.S. PATEL; T.U. PATEL; H.M. PATEL; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
1
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted during 2011–12 and 2012–13 at Navsari, Gujarat to study the effect of different proportion of organics on productivity of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) under organic farming system. The experiment was laid out in ramdomized block design with 3 replications comprising 8 organic treatments and 1 inorganic treatment as control (250:125:125 kg NPK/ha). Significantly higher plant height (399.7 cm), millable canes (129.8 t/ha), cane height (298.2 cm), and single cane weight (1.54 kg) were recorded with 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cake. However, application of nitrogen through vermicompost (50% RDN) along with either castor cake or neem cake (50% RDN) were found equally effective and recorded significantly higher millable cane (129.8 and 128.2 t/ha respectively) and trash yield (23.2 and 22.7 t/ha respectively). In organic vs inorganic-(control) analysis, application of 100% RDF through inorganic fertilizers recorded significantly higher values of growth and yield parameters, and yield of sugarcane crop. Hence for producing higher and profitable cane yield of sugarcane, the crop should be fertilized with 100% RDF (250:125:125 NPK kg/ha) under south Gujarat conditions. Further, for organic production of sugarcane crop, application of 50% RDN through vermicompost and remaining 50% RDN either through castor cake or neem cake was found remunerative.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost and castor cake regime produced significantly higher plant height of 399.7 cm.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cakee0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
399.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Significantly higher plant height (399.7 cm), millable canes (129.8 t/ha), cane height (298.2 cm), and single cane weight (1.54 kg) were recorded with 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 398–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The vermicompost and castor cake regime produced significantly higher millable canes of 129.8 t/ha.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Treatment
50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cakee0
Outcome
millable canese0
Value
129.8 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“millable canes (129.8 t/ha), cane height (298.2 cm), and single cane weight (1.54 kg) were recorded with 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cane height was 298.2 cm with the vermicompost and castor cake regime.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
cane heighte0
Value
298.2 cme0

Verbatim

e0

“cane height (298.2 cm), and single cane weight (1.54 kg) were recorded with 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single cane weight was 1.54 kg with the vermicompost and castor cake regime.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
single cane weighte0
Value
1.54 kge0

Verbatim

e0

“single cane weight (1.54 kg) were recorded with 50% recommended dose of nitrogen (RDN) through vermicompost and 50% RDN through castor cake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 501–640 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake and neem cake with vermicompost yielded 129.8 and 128.2 t/ha of millable cane, respectively.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
millable canee0
Value
129.8 and 128.2 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“castor cake or neem cake (50% RDN) were found equally effective and recorded significantly higher millable cane (129.8 and 128.2 t/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 724–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Castor cake and neem cake with vermicompost yielded 23.2 and 22.7 t/ha of trash, respectively.

Taxon
sugarcanet0
Outcome
trash yielde0
Value
23.2 and 22.7 t/hae0

Verbatim

e0

“trash yield (23.2 and 22.7 t/ha respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–921 · show in text ↑
t0

“Performance of pit planted sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) under organic management”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–85 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Inorganic fertilizer gave significantly higher growth and yield than organic fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
growth and yield parameters, and yield of sugarcane crope0
Direction
highere0

Verbatim

e0

“application of 100% RDF through inorganic fertilizers recorded significantly higher values of growth and yield parameters, and yield of sugarcane crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 100% RDF under south Gujarat conditions for higher profitable cane yield.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
crop should be fertilized with 100% RDF (250:125:125 NPK kg/ha)e0
Setting
south Gujarate0

Verbatim

e0

“for producing higher and profitable cane yield of sugarcane, the crop should be fertilized with 100% RDF (250:125:125 NPK kg/ha) under south Gujarat conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1284 · show in text ↑
Recommendationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

For organic sugarcane production, vermicompost plus castor or neem cake was remunerative.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Outcome
application of 50% RDN through vermicompost and remaining 50% RDN either through castor cake or neem cakee0

Verbatim

e0

“for organic production of sugarcane crop, application of 50% RDN through vermicompost and remaining 50% RDN either through castor cake or neem cake was found remunerative”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1295–1465 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ

47 papers: 40 positive, 7 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.