Abstract
A field trail was carried out at Campus for Research and Advanced Studies, Dhablan, G.S.S.D.G.S Khalsa College, Patiala during the Rabi season of 2017-18. The field trial was laid out in randomized block design with eleven treatments T1: (Control), T2 : ( 100% RDF ), T3 : (50% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha), T4 : (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha),T5: (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha), T6: (50% RDF + FYM 10 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz.), T7: (50% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha), T8: (100% RDF (NPK) + FYM 5 t/ha), T9: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha), T10: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz.), T11: (100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha) in three replications. Application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield of barley. Significantly higher net returns and benefit cost (1.43) were observed with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha. However, benefit cost ratio remained at par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. (1.40) and also in 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha (1.37).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment significantly increased barley growth.
- Taxon
- barley
.jpg?width=60)
Hordeum vulgaree0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/hae0
- Outcome
- growthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield of barley.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment significantly increased barley yield attributes and yield.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaree0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/hae0
- Outcome
- yield attributes and yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha significantly increased growth, yield attributes and yield of barley.”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment gave significantly higher net returns.
- Taxon
- barleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/hae0
- Outcome
- net returnse0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher net returns and benefit cost (1.43) were observed with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined nutrient treatment yielded a benefit cost ratio of 1.43.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Treatment
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/hae0
- Outcome
- benefit coste0
- Value
- 1.43e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Significantly higher net returns and benefit cost (1.43) were observed with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. + VC 2 t/ha.”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for the full combination was statistically at par with the combination without VC, which returned 1.40.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 1.40e0
- Comparator
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz.e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, benefit cost ratio remained at par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. (1.40) and also in 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha (1.37).”
t0“Barley”
Claim · model-written summary
Benefit cost ratio for the full combination was statistically at par with the combination without Rhiz. and VC, which returned 1.37.
- Taxon
- BarleyHordeum vulgaret0
- Outcome
- benefit cost ratioe0
- Direction
- at pare0
- Value
- 1.37e0
- Comparator
- 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/hae0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“However, benefit cost ratio remained at par with the application of 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha + Rhiz. (1.40) and also in 100% RDF + FYM 5 t/ha + PM 2 t/ha (1.37).”
t0“Barley”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · growth · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
137 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
161 papers more in this group
See all 165 papers →fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results
472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- no effect
- negative
546 papers more in this group
See all 550 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.