Abstract
The current study was conducted to examine the successive and profitability of pruning in canopy management and high density planting in Guava orchard under Western Uttar Pradesh condition. The experiment was carried out in the orchard established at Research Farm, Krishi Vigyan Kendra, Hastinapur, Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, University of Agriculture & Technology, Meerut, during the year 2017-2018 were studied. Rectangular system of planting and layout is preferred as it facilitates orchard operations. Planting was done in the month of February- March and August-September. Observation revealed that the pruning and high density with plant spacing (3.0 X 3.0 M) increased the fruit yield significantly, Similarly, with increase in spacing wise pruning in canopy management and high density was need to increased. Plant growth in term of stock girth of P. guajava cv. Florda seedless (47.20 cm) and scion girth of P. guajava cv. Allahabad seedless (44.7 cm), tree spread (N - S) and canopy volume increased with the plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M), while tree height decreased. To increase in plant spacing, number of fruits per plant, yield per plant and fruit density was higher at 3.0 × 3.0 M and least in 6.0 × 6.0 M plant spacing. Pruning in canopy management and high planting density was found to be better owing to maximum absorption of solar radiation and optimum microclimate in the orchard leading to better yield in plants, higher fruit density and yield efficiency, However yield per hectare was maximum 3.0 X3.0 M spacing in during rainy season and in 6.0 × 3.0 M spacing during winter.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Pruning with 3.0 X 3.0 M spacing significantly increased guava fruit yield.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- pruning and high density with plant spacing (3.0 X 3.0 M)e0
- Outcome
- fruit yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“pruning and high density with plant spacing (3.0 X 3.0 M) increased the fruit yield significantly”
Claim · model-written summary
Stock girth of P. guajava cv. Florda seedless increased with 3.0 × 3.0 M spacing, reaching 47.20 cm.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- P. guajava cv. Florda seedlesse0
- Treatment
- plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)e0
- Outcome
- stock girthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 47.20 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“stock girth of P. guajava cv. Florda seedless (47.20 cm) and scion girth of P. guajava cv. Allahabad seedless (44.7 cm), tree spread (N - S) and canopy volume increased with the plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)”
Claim · model-written summary
Scion girth of P. guajava cv. Allahabad seedless increased with 3.0 × 3.0 M spacing, reaching 44.7 cm.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Material
- P. guajava cv. Allahabad seedlesse0
- Treatment
- plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)e0
- Outcome
- scion girthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 44.7 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“scion girth of P. guajava cv. Allahabad seedless (44.7 cm), tree spread (N - S) and canopy volume increased with the plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tree spread and canopy volume increased with 3.0 × 3.0 M spacing.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)e0
- Outcome
- tree spread (N - S) and canopy volumee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“tree spread (N - S) and canopy volume increased with the plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)”
Claim · model-written summary
Tree height decreased with 3.0 × 3.0 M spacing.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M)e0
- Outcome
- tree heighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“tree spread (N - S) and canopy volume increased with the plant spacing (3.0 × 3.0 M), while tree height decreased”
Claim · model-written summary
Number of fruits per plant, yield per plant and fruit density were higher at 3.0 × 3.0 M than 6.0 × 6.0 M spacing.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 3.0 × 3.0 Me0
- Outcome
- number of fruits per plant, yield per plant and fruit densitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- 6.0 × 6.0 Me0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“number of fruits per plant, yield per plant and fruit density was higher at 3.0 × 3.0 M and least in 6.0 × 6.0 M plant spacing”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors attributed better yield, fruit density and yield efficiency under pruning and high density planting to solar radiation absorption and orchard microclimate.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- Pruning in canopy management and high planting densitye0
- Outcome
- better yield in plants, higher fruit density and yield efficiencye0
- Qualifier
- maximum absorption of solar radiation and optimum microclimatee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“Pruning in canopy management and high planting density was found to be better owing to maximum absorption of solar radiation and optimum microclimate in the orchard leading to better yield in plants, higher fruit density and yield efficiency”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield per hectare was maximum at 3.0 X3.0 M spacing in the rainy season.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 3.0 X3.0 M spacinge0
- Outcome
- yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- rainy seasone0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“yield per hectare was maximum 3.0 X3.0 M spacing in during rainy season and in 6.0 × 3.0 M spacing during winter”
Claim · model-written summary
Yield per hectare was maximum at 6.0 × 3.0 M spacing in winter.
- Taxon
- guava
Psidium guajavat0 - Treatment
- 6.0 × 3.0 M spacinge0
- Outcome
- yield per hectaree0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Qualifier
- wintere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“guava orchard”
e0“yield per hectare was maximum 3.0 X3.0 M spacing in during rainy season and in 6.0 × 3.0 M spacing during winter”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results differ
67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
66 papers more in this group
See all 70 papers →density · growth · Psidium guajava (guava)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →density · yield · Psidium guajava (guava)Results agree
8 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.