Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of fertilizer levels on yield and economics of summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)

NS Ghule; AS Bhosale; AV Satpute; et al.

8
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The agronomic investigation entitled, “Performance of summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.) to fertilizer levels”was undertaken at Post Graduate Research Farm, Agronomy Division of Rajarshee Chhatrapati Shahu Maharaj College of Agriculture, Kolhapur (M.S.), India during summer, 2019. The experiment was laid out in a factorial randomized block design were replicated thrice with twelve treatment combinations comprises three NP fertilizer levels NP1-75% of RDF (15, 30 kg ha-1 N and P2O5), NP2-100% of RDF (20, 40 kg ha-1 N and P2O5), and NP3-125% of RDF (25, 50 kg ha-1 N and P2O5), and four potassium levels as a K0 (00 K2O Kg ha-1), K1 (15 K2O Kg ha-1), K2 (20 K2O Kg ha-1) and K3 (25 K2O Kg ha-1). Yield and economics of summer green were influenced significantly by different NP fertilizer levels. The grain yield (15.14 q ha-1) and stover yield (34.17 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively). Harvest index (%) of green gram was found non-significant, whereas the highest harvest index 30.69% was found with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF). Economics of summer green production viz., gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratio were found significantly beneficial with the treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which wasfound at par with treatment NP2 (100% of RDF). Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively). Harvest index remain unaffected due to different potassium levels. Economics of summer green production viz., gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratio were found significantly beneficial with the treatment application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 which was found at par K2- 20 K2O Kg ha-1.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP3 gave the highest green gram grain yield, 15.14 q ha-1, followed by NP2 at 14.21 q ha-1.

Treatment
NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
15.14 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
14.21 q ha-1e0
Comparator
NP2 (100% of RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield (15.14 q ha-1) and stover yield (34.17 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP3 gave the highest green gram stover yield, 34.17 q ha-1, followed by NP2 at 31.55 q ha-1.

Treatment
NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
34.17 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
31.55 q ha-1e0
Comparator
NP2 (100% of RDF)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield (15.14 q ha-1) and stover yield (34.17 q ha-1) of green gram were recorded significantly highest with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) which was followed by NP2 (100% of RDF) (14.21 q ha-1 grain and 31.55 q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–1053 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP3 had the highest harvest index, 30.69%, but the NP effect was not significant.

Treatment
NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
30.69%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index (%) of green gram was found non-significant, whereas the highest harvest index 30.69% was found with treatment NP3 (125% of RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1197 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

NP3 gave significantly beneficial gross and net monetary returns and benefit cost ratio, at par with NP2.

Taxon
summer greene0
Treatment
NP3 (125% of RDF)e0
Outcome
gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
beneficiale0
Comparator
NP2 (100% of RDF)e0

Verbatim

e0

“Economics of summer green production viz., gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratio were found significantly beneficial with the treatment NP3 (125% of RDF) and which wasfound at par with treatment NP2 (100% of RDF).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1198–1434 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 gave maximum grain yield of 15.19 q ha-1, at par with K2 at 14.67 q ha-1.

Treatment
K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
15.19 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
14.67 q ha-1e0
Comparator
K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 gave maximum stover yield of 33.32 q ha-1, at par with K2 at 32.25q ha-1.

Treatment
K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
stover yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
33.32 q ha-1e0
Qualifier
32.25q ha-1e0
Comparator
K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the potassium levels application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 was recorded significantly maximum grain yield (15.19 q ha-1) and stover yield (33.32 q ha-1) however, it was found at par with K2- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 (14.67 q ha-1 grain and 32.25q ha-1 stover yield respectively).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvest index was unaffected by potassium level.

Treatment
different potassium levelse0
Outcome
Harvest indexe0
Direction
unaffectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vigna radiata var. radiata
Vigna radiata var. radiata · Taxon · picture of the speciesIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Harvest index remain unaffected due to different potassium levels.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1707–1773 · show in text ↑
t0

“summer green gram (Vigna radiata L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

K3 produced significantly beneficial gross and net monetary returns and benefit cost ratio, at par with K2.

Taxon
summer greene0
Treatment
K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1e0
Outcome
gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratioe0
Direction
beneficiale0
Comparator
K2- 20 K2O Kg ha-1e0

Verbatim

e0

“Economics of summer green production viz., gross and net monetary returns as well as benefit cost ratio were found significantly beneficial with the treatment application of K3- 25 K2O Kg ha-1 which was found at par K2- 20 K2O Kg ha-1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–2009 · show in text ↑

potassium · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

54 papers: 50 positive, 4 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

50 papers more in this group

See all 54 papers →

fertilization · yield · Vigna radiata (mung bean)Positive and negative results

375 papers: 364 positive, 11 negative or no effect

363 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

371 papers more in this group

See all 375 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.