Paper · 2020 · VEGETABLE CROPS OF RUSSIA

Influence of drop irrigation and ways of primary tillage on yield and quality of fruits of sweet pepper in the conditions of the Republic of Dagestan

D. S. Magomedova; S. A. Kurbanov; D. M. Ramazanov

15
claims
33
verbatim quotes
1
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Relevance. In the conditions of the dry-steppe zone of lowland Dagestan, the beneficial effect of drip irrigation in combination with dump cultivation on the yield and quality of sweet pepper fruits from Moldova proved. Results. It experimentally established that maintaining moisture in the active 0.5 m soil layer during the growing season within 80- 100% of LMC against the background of dump processing to a depth of 0.23-0.25 m led to an increase in yield and biochemical composition of sweet pepper fruits. Differences in the influence of dump and small (0.10-0.12 m) tillage on agrophysical and phytosanitary indicators of fertility of meadow medium loamy soil were revealed. The data showing the inappropriateness of using small-scale cultivation under conditions of irrigated vegetable growing, which leads to a deterioration in the agrophysical indicators of fertility: increase in soil density by 0.05-0.08 t/m3, decrease in the number of water-resistant units by 7,0%, water permeability reduction by 22.0% and water resistance coefficient by 12.9%, 2.1 times increase in planting weed and 212.6% potential soil weed. Of the three studied thresholds of soil moisture (70, 80 and 90% LMC), it was established that the best conditions for plant growth and development, optimization of their photosynthetic activity are created at a humidity threshold of 80% LMC, at which the most efficient use of irrigation water is noted. Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processing leads to an increase in the number of fruits on 1 plant, an increase in the mass of 1 fruit, which contributed to an increase in yield to 62 t/ha.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining 80–100% LMC under dump tillage increased sweet pepper fruit yield.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
maintaining moisture in the active 0.5 m soil layer during the growing season within 80- 100% of LMC against the background of dump processing to a depth of 0.23-0.25 me0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining moisture in the active 0.5 m soil layer during the growing season within 80- 100% of LMC against the background of dump processing to a depth of 0.23-0.25 m led to an increase in yield and biochemical composition of sweet pepper fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maintaining 80–100% LMC under dump tillage increased sweet pepper fruit biochemical composition.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuume0
Treatment
maintaining moisture in the active 0.5 m soil layer during the growing season within 80- 100% of LMC against the background of dump processing to a depth of 0.23-0.25 me0
Outcome
biochemical composition of sweet pepper fruitse0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“maintaining moisture in the active 0.5 m soil layer during the growing season within 80- 100% of LMC against the background of dump processing to a depth of 0.23-0.25 m led to an increase in yield and biochemical composition of sweet pepper fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 264–511 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation increased soil density by 0.05–0.08 t/m3.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione0
Outcome
soil densitye0
Direction
increasee0
Value
0.05-0.08 t/m3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“small-scale cultivation under conditions of irrigated vegetable growing, which leads to a deterioration in the agrophysical indicators of fertility: increase in soil density by 0.05-0.08 t/m3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–922 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation reduced water-resistant soil units by 7.0%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione1
Outcome
number of water-resistant unitse0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
7,0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decrease in the number of water-resistant units by 7,0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 924–979 · show in text ↑
e1

“small-scale cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation reduced water permeability by 22.0%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione1
Outcome
water permeabilitye0
Direction
reductione0
Value
22.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water permeability reduction by 22.0%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 981–1018 · show in text ↑
e1

“small-scale cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation reduced the water resistance coefficient by 12.9%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione1
Outcome
water resistance coefficiente0
Value
12.9%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water resistance coefficient by 12.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“small-scale cultivation under conditions of irrigated vegetable growing, which leads to a deterioration in the agrophysical indicators of fertility: increase in soil density by 0.05-0.08 t/m3, decrease in the number of water-resistant units by 7,0%, water permeability reduction by 22.0% and water resistance coefficient by 12.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation increased planting weed 2.1 times.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
planting weede0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.1 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“2.1 times increase in planting weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1097 · show in text ↑
e1

“small-scale cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Small-scale cultivation increased potential soil weed by 212.6%.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
small-scale cultivatione1
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
potential soil weede0
Value
212.6%e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“212.6% potential soil weed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1128 · show in text ↑
e1

“small-scale cultivation under conditions of irrigated vegetable growing, which leads to a deterioration in the agrophysical indicators of fertility”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–878 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80% LMC threshold gave the best conditions for sweet pepper growth and development.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humidity threshold of 80% LMCe0
Outcome
plant growth and developmente0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best conditions for plant growth and development, optimization of their photosynthetic activity are created at a humidity threshold of 80% LMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1225–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80% LMC threshold optimized sweet pepper photosynthetic activity.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humidity threshold of 80% LMCe0
Outcome
photosynthetic activitye0
Direction
optimizatione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimization of their photosynthetic activity are created at a humidity threshold of 80% LMC”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1279–1371 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An 80% LMC threshold gave the most efficient irrigation water use.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
humidity threshold of 80% LMCe0
Outcome
use of irrigation watere0
Direction
most efficiente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at a humidity threshold of 80% LMC, at which the most efficient use of irrigation water is noted”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1337–1433 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at at least 80% moisture under dump tillage increased fruits per sweet pepper plant.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processinge0
Outcome
number of fruits on 1 plante0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processing leads to an increase in the number of fruits on 1 plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1634 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at at least 80% moisture under dump tillage increased mass per sweet pepper fruit.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processinge0
Outcome
mass of 1 fruite0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processing leads to an increase in the number of fruits on 1 plant, an increase in the mass of 1 fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1670 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation at at least 80% moisture under dump tillage increased sweet pepper yield to 62 t/ha.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processinge0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Value
62 t/hae0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Drip irrigation with maintaining the pre-irrigation threshold for soil moisture not lower than 80% of against the background of dump processing leads to an increase in the number of fruits on 1 plant, an increase in the mass of 1 fruit, which contributed to an increase in yield to 62 t/ha.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1435–1725 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors deem small-scale cultivation inappropriate for irrigated vegetables.

Taxon
sweet pepperCapsicum annuumt0
Outcome
inappropriateness of using small-scale cultivatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inappropriateness of using small-scale cultivation under conditions of irrigated vegetable growing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 704–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“sweet pepper”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–103 · show in text ↑

climate site · quality: general · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
See all 3 papers →

soil water · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

climate site · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

irrigation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 44 positive, 17 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

humidity · physiology: photosynthesis · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.