Paper · 2020 · Journal of Plant Production

Effect of Foliar Feeding with some Chelated Nutrients on Productivity and Quality of Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86

M. W. M. EL-Shazly

5
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Field experiment was carried out through 2018 season and repeated through 2019 season at El-Gemmeiza Agricultural Research Station, El-Gharbia Governorate, Egypt. These experiments aimed to study the effect of three foliar sprays with chelated magnesium and/or zinc on productivity and quality of the Egyptian cotton cultivar Giza 86. Two levels (2 and 4 g of each nutrient/liter water (,in addition to the control treatment were used. The experimental design was a randomized complete blocks with 3 replications.The data indicated that combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zinc at the two levels used significantly increased the concentrations of Mg, Zn and photosynthetic pigments in the leaves in both seasons. In addition, combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zinc at the low level (2 g/liter water of each nutrient) significantly increased total dry weight/plant, leaf area index, plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of total flowers/plant, number of total bolls set/plant, boll setting percentage, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, lint percentage and seed cotton yield/feddan, fiber length, uniformity index and fiber strength in both seasons. The control treatment recorded the lowest values of these traits and significantly increased boll shedding percentage. Micronaire reading was insignificantly affected. It could be concluded this combination three times to obtain the high quality and productivity and recommended the possibility of being applied by farmers to enhance cotton productivity in light of the lack of magnesium and zinc in the soil under conditions similar to El-Gemmeiza region.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined magnesium and zinc increased leaf Mg, Zn, and pigment concentrations in both seasons.

Taxon
Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86Gossypium barbadenset0
Material
Giza 86t0
Treatment
combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zince0
Outcome
concentrations of Mg, Zn and photosynthetic pigments in the leavese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zinc at the two levels used significantly increased the concentrations of Mg, Zn and photosynthetic pigments in the leaves in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–728 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition to the control treatment were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The low dose combination increased seed cotton yield in both seasons.

Taxon
Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zinc at the low level (2 g/liter water of each nutrient)e0
Outcome
seed cotton yield/feddane0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
in both seasonse0
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combination between chelated magnesium and chelated zinc at the low level (2 g/liter water of each nutrient) significantly increased total dry weight/plant, leaf area index, plant height, number of fruiting branches/plant, number of total flowers/plant, number of total bolls set/plant, boll setting percentage, earliness percentage, number of open bolls/plant, boll weight, seed index, lint percentage and seed cotton yield/feddan, fiber length, uniformity index and fiber strength in both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 742–1241 · show in text ↑
e1

“addition to the control treatment were used.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–435 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The control significantly increased boll shedding.

Taxon
Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86Gossypium barbadenset0
Treatment
control treatmente0
Outcome
boll shedding percentagee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control treatment recorded the lowest values of these traits and significantly increased boll shedding percentage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Micronaire reading was insignificantly affected.

Taxon
Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86Gossypium barbadenset0
Outcome
Micronaire readinge0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Micronaire reading was insignificantly affected.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1361–1409 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend the nutrient combination to enhance cotton productivity under comparable conditions.

Taxon
Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86Gossypium barbadenset0
Outcome
enhance cotton productivitye0
Setting
El-Gemmeiza regione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium barbadense
Gossypium barbadense · TaxonForest and Kim Starr · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“recommended the possibility of being applied by farmers to enhance cotton productivity in light of the lack of magnesium and zinc in the soil under conditions similar to El-Gemmeiza region.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1509–1698 · show in text ↑
t0

“Egyptian Cotton Cultivar Giza 86”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–117 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Gossypium barbadense (Egyptian cotton)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.