Paper · 2020 · Journal of the Bangladesh Agricultural University

Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in response to different levels of irrigation and nitrogen application

Suriaya Perveen; Md Salam; Md Uddin; et al.

9
claims
19
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Balanced fertilizer management and optimum irrigation are essential for maximizing the yield of wheat and at the same time, excess application of water and nitrogen fertilizer are not economically efficient and can create environmental problems. Therefore, an experiment was conducted at the Central Farm, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh from November 2018 through March 2019 to determine the optimum level of irrigation and rate of nitrogen required to achieve the maximum yield of wheat. The experiment consisted of four levels of irrigation i.e., no irrigation (I0), one irrigation at Crown Root Initiation (CRI) stage (I1), two irrigations at CRI and 40 Days After Sowing (DAS) (I2), and three irrigations at CRI, 40 and 60 DAS (I3), and four rates of nitrogen i.e., no nitrogen (N0), application of 60 kg N ha-1 (N1), application of 120 kg N ha-1 (N2) and application of 180 kg N ha-1 (N3). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design with three replications where irrigation level was assigned to the main plots and nitrogen level in subplots. BARI Gom28 was used as the test variety. The maximum grain yield (4.00t ha-1) was found with three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS. Application of 180 kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (4.54t ha-1) which was the cumulative effect of the highest number of effective tillers hill-1, longest spike, and highest number of grains spike-1 in this treatment. Yield and yield contributing characters like effective tillers hill-1, number of grains spike-1, grain yield, and straw yield were significantly influenced by the interaction of irrigation and nitrogen. The highest grain yield (5.22t ha-1) was obtained in three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS with the application of 180 kg N ha-1 which was statistically identical to two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with the application of 120 kg N ha-1. In the economic analysis of this study, the highest Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) (2.41) was found from two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with an application of 120 kg N ha-1 (I2N2). Therefore, the treatment combination of two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with an application of 120 kg N ha-1 was effective and economic for producing a higher grain yield of wheat. [J Bangladesh Agril Univ 2020; 18(4.000): 968-974]

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three irrigations at CRI, 40 and 60 DAS gave the maximum wheat grain yield of 4.00 t ha-1.

Treatment
three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DASe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4.00t ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e0

“The maximum grain yield (4.00t ha-1) was found with three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 180 kg N ha-1 gave the highest wheat grain yield of 4.54 t ha-1.

Treatment
Application of 180 kg N ha-1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
higheste1
Value
4.54t ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 180 kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (4.54t ha-1) which was the cumulative effect of the highest number of effective tillers hill-1, longest spike, and highest number of grains spike-1 in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1430 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield with 180 kg N ha-1 was the cumulative effect of the highest number of effective tillers hill-1, longest spike and highest number of grains spike-1.

Outcome
grain yielde1
Qualifier
the cumulative effect of the highest number of effective tillers hill-1, longest spike, and highest number of grains spike-1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of 180 kg N ha-1 gave the highest grain yield (4.54t ha-1) which was the cumulative effect of the highest number of effective tillers hill-1, longest spike, and highest number of grains spike-1 in this treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1207–1430 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective tillers hill-1, number of grains spike-1 and grain yield were significantly influenced by the interaction of irrigation and nitrogen.

Treatment
interaction of irrigation and nitrogene2
Outcome
effective tillers hill-1, number of grains spike-1, grain yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield and yield contributing characters like effective tillers hill-1, number of grains spike-1, grain yield, and straw yield were significantly influenced by the interaction of irrigation and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1633 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield was significantly influenced by the interaction of irrigation and nitrogen.

Treatment
interaction of irrigation and nitrogene2
Outcome
straw yielde2

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e2

“Yield and yield contributing characters like effective tillers hill-1, number of grains spike-1, grain yield, and straw yield were significantly influenced by the interaction of irrigation and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1432–1633 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain yield of 5.22 t ha-1 was obtained with three irrigations at CRI, 40 and 60 DAS and 180 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS with the application of 180 kg N ha-1e3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
higheste3
Value
5.22t ha-1e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield (5.22t ha-1) was obtained in three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS with the application of 180 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with 120 kg N ha-1 gave a grain yield statistically identical to three irrigations at CRI, 40 and 60 DAS with 180 kg N ha-1.

Treatment
two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with the application of 120 kg N ha-1e4
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
statistically identicale4
Comparator
three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS with the application of 180 kg N ha-1e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e4

“which was statistically identical to two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with the application of 120 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1767–1875 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest grain yield (5.22t ha-1) was obtained in three irrigations at CRI, 40, and 60 DAS with the application of 180 kg N ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1635–1766 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with 120 kg N ha-1 gave the highest benefit-cost ratio of 2.41.

Treatment
two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with an application of 120 kg N ha-1e5
Outcome
Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR)e5
Direction
higheste5
Value
2.41e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e5

“the highest Benefit-Cost Ratio (BCR) (2.41) was found from two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with an application of 120 kg N ha-1 (I2N2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1917–2053 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with 120 kg N ha-1 are recommended as effective and economic for producing a higher wheat grain yield.

Outcome
effective and economice6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Performance of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–43 · show in text ↑
e6

“the treatment combination of two irrigations at CRI and 40 DAS with an application of 120 kg N ha-1 was effective and economic for producing a higher grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2236 · show in text ↑

crown compound · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

37 papers: 30 positive, 7 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.