Paper · 2008 · Iraqi Journal of Desert Studies

Role of Irrigation Method and Bitumen in Improvement of soil physical Characteristics and Yield of Corn

Bahaa A.. Al-hadeethi; Saif Al-deen A.Razaq Salim

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to investigate the role of irrigation method and bitumen (petroleum derived product) in improvement of soil physical characteristic and yield of corn at the Gypsiferous Soil Experimental Station in Aldoor, 200 km Northeast Baghdad, Iraq. Irrigation was practiced by there methods: surface, sprinkler, and drip. Bitumen was mixed with the upper 15 cm of soil surface at concentration of 0.5% on soil mass basis. A split-split plot in RCBD with four replicates was used in which the main plots were assigned for the irrigation treatment, subplots for the cultivation, and the sub-sub plots for bitumen treatment. Irrigation was accomplished based on evaporation of class-A pan. In general, results indicated that the application of bitumen improved soil characteristic and increased yield. Interaction between irrigation, cultivation and bitumen increased (MWD). Values of soil bulk density increased by 1.12, 5.7 with sprinkler and drip irrigation respectively comparing with surface irrigation. Significant interaction observed between irrigation and bitumen by its effects on the values of sub surface, the heights value, and on the other hand the lowest value was 0.725 cm/hr. Infiltration rate increased under sprinkler and drip irrigation, average infiltration rate increased under circumstance use of drip, sprinkler and surface irrigation. Addition of bitumen was improved subsurface hydraulic conductivity by 102% compared with no bitumen addition. Significant decreases observed with infiltration and average infiltration rate as result of bitumen uses. On the other hand the values of average infiltration rate for cultivated, none cultivated increased under uses of drip, sprinkler and surface irrigation. Grain yield was 4.6 and 3.68 ton/ha with surface drip, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively. Grain yield was superior with the addition of bitumen by 32% compared with not bitumen application.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitumen increased corn yield.

Treatment
application of bitumene0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“application of bitumen improved soil characteristic and increased yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–820 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, cultivation and bitumen together increased soil mean weight diameter.

Treatment
irrigation, cultivation and bitumene0
Outcome
MWDe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Interaction between irrigation, cultivation and bitumen increased (MWD).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 821–893 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased soil bulk density by 1.12 relative to surface irrigation.

Treatment
sprinklere0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.12e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Values of soil bulk density increased by 1.12, 5.7 with sprinkler and drip irrigation respectively comparing with surface irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1027 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased soil bulk density by 5.7 relative to surface irrigation.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
soil bulk densitye0
Direction
increasede0
Value
5.7e0
Comparator
surface irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Values of soil bulk density increased by 1.12, 5.7 with sprinkler and drip irrigation respectively comparing with surface irrigation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1027 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation and bitumen interacted significantly in their effect on a subsurface soil measure; the lowest reported value was 0.725 cm/hr.

Outcome
values of sub surfacee0
Direction
loweste0
Value
0.725 cm/hre0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant interaction observed between irrigation and bitumen by its effects on the values of sub surface, the heights value, and on the other hand the lowest value was 0.725 cm/hr.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1211 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation increased soil infiltration rate.

Treatment
sprinklere0
Outcome
Infiltration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Infiltration rate increased under sprinkler and drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1275 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Drip irrigation increased soil infiltration rate.

Treatment
drip irrigatione0
Outcome
Infiltration ratee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Infiltration rate increased under sprinkler and drip irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1212–1275 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding bitumen improved subsurface hydraulic conductivity by 102% relative to no bitumen.

Treatment
Addition of bitumene0
Outcome
subsurface hydraulic conductivitye0
Direction
improvede0
Value
102%e0
Comparator
no bitumen additione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Addition of bitumen was improved subsurface hydraulic conductivity by 102% compared with no bitumen addition.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1379–1488 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitumen significantly decreased infiltration and average infiltration rates.

Treatment
bitumen usese0
Outcome
infiltration and average infiltration ratee0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Significant decreases observed with infiltration and average infiltration rate as result of bitumen uses.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1489–1594 · show in text ↑

schema checkedfield values found in the cited quotesPermalinkReport an issue

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface drip irrigation produced corn grain yield of 4.6 ton/ha.

Treatment
surface dripe0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
4.6e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield was 4.6 and 3.68 ton/ha with surface drip, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1843 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sprinkler irrigation produced corn grain yield of 3.68 ton/ha.

Treatment
sprinkler irrigatione0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Value
3.68 ton/hae0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield was 4.6 and 3.68 ton/ha with surface drip, and sprinkler irrigation, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1749–1843 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bitumen increased corn grain yield by 32% relative to no bitumen.

Treatment
addition of bitumene0
Outcome
Grain yielde0
Direction
superiore0
Value
32%e0
Comparator
not bitumen applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–103 · show in text ↑
e0

“Grain yield was superior with the addition of bitumen by 32% compared with not bitumen application.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1844–1943 · show in text ↑