Paper · 2021 · Plants

Supplemental Far-Red Light Stimulates Lettuce Growth: Disentangling Morphological and Physiological Effects

Reeve Legendre; Marc W. van Iersel

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
103
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

), far-red light (700-800 nm) is integral to initiating shade responses which can increase plant growth. In the first of two studies, plants were grown with a similar photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) but different intensities of far-red light. The second study used perpendicular gradients of far-red light and PPFD, allowing for examination of interactive effects. The far-red gradient study revealed that increasing supplemental far-red light increased leaf length and width, which was associated with increased projected canopy size (PCS). The higher PCS was associated with increased cumulative incident light received by plants, which increased dry matter accumulation. In the perpendicular gradient study, far-red light was 57% and 183% more effective at increasing the amount of light received by the plant, as well as 92.5% and 162% more effective at increasing plant biomass at the early and late harvests, respectively, as compared to PPFD. Light use efficiency (LUE, biomass/mol incident light) was generally negatively correlated with specific leaf area (SLA). Far-red light provided by LEDs increases the canopy size to capture more light to drive photosynthesis and shows promise for inclusion in the growth light spectrum for lettuce under sole-source lighting.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing far-red light increased lettuce leaf length and width.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
supplemental far-red lighte0
Outcome
leaf length and widthe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing supplemental far-red light increased leaf length and width”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 416–485 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater leaf dimensions were associated with greater projected canopy size.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Outcome
projected canopy size (PCS)e0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased leaf length and width, which was associated with increased projected canopy size (PCS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 454–550 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher projected canopy size was associated with more cumulative incident light and dry matter accumulation.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
cumulative incident lighte0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
dry matter accumulatione0
Comparator
PCSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The higher PCS was associated with increased cumulative incident light received by plants, which increased dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–683 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At early and late harvests, far-red light was 57% and 183% more effective than PPFD at increasing received light.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Treatment
far-red lighte0
Outcome
amount of light received by the plante0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
57% and 183%e0
Comparator
PPFDe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“far-red light was 57% and 183% more effective at increasing the amount of light received by the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 721–822 · show in text ↑
e1

“as compared to PPFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At early and late harvests, far-red light was 92.5% and 162% more effective than PPFD at increasing biomass.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Outcome
plant biomasse0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
92.5% and 162%e0
Comparator
PPFDe0

Not reportedTreatment

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“92.5% and 162% more effective at increasing plant biomass at the early and late harvests, respectively, as compared to PPFD”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–958 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Light use efficiency was generally negatively correlated with specific leaf area.

Taxon
LettuceLactuca sativat0
Organ / stage
specific leaf areae0
Outcome
Light use efficiencye0
Direction
negatively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Light use efficiency (LUE, biomass/mol incident light) was generally negatively correlated with specific leaf area (SLA).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“Lettuce”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 38–45 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 243 positive, 57 negative or no effect

242 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.