Paper · 2020 · Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies

Effect of different organic amendments on the parasitic behavior of Pasteuria penetrans for the management of Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato

Sujata Sujata; Anil Kumar; Vinod Kumar

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to assess the effect of organic amendments (neem cake, mustard cake, castor cake, and farmyard manure) on parasitic behavior of Pasteuria penetrans for the management of root knot-nematode, Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato under screen house conditions. After one week, seedlings were inoculated with 1000 J2 of M. javanica encumbered with P. penetrans (at least 5-7 endospores of P. penetrans per juvenile). Organic amendments were applied at the rate of 10 g/pot, either individually or in combination with P. penetrans. Untreated (having nematode) and uninoculated (healthy) plants served as control. Each treatment was replicated three times. The results revealed that there was synergistic effect of bacteria and organic amendments in the management of M. javanica. The growth parameters of tomato were significantly increased by the combined application of P. penetrans @ 1x104 spores/g of soil and mustard cake @ 10 g/kg soil. Minimum number of galls, eggs per root system and final nematode population in 200 cc soil was recorded, where combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake were applied. Overall assessment of the results of the present study suggested that amongst the four organic amendments tested, combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake seemed to be more promising approach in the management of M. javanica in tomato nursery as it caused greater nematode suppression and improved plant growth parameters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined Pasteuria and organic amendments acted synergistically against Meloidogyne javanica.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Outcome
management of M. javanicae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was synergistic effect of bacteria and organic amendments in the management of M. javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–802 · show in text ↑
t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria spores with mustard cake significantly increased tomato growth parameters.

Treatment
combined application of P. penetrans @ 1x104 spores/g of soil and mustard cake @ 10 g/kg soile0
Interactor
P. penetransPasteuria penetranse0biocontrol_agent
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
Untreated (having nematode) and uninoculated (healthy) plantse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The growth parameters of tomato were significantly increased by the combined application of P. penetrans @ 1x104 spores/g of soil and mustard cake @ 10 g/kg soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–965 · show in text ↑
e1

“Untreated (having nematode) and uninoculated (healthy) plants served as control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 556–635 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria with mustard cake gave the minimum number of nematode galls.

Treatment
combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cakee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae1pathogen
Outcome
number of gallse0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum number of galls, eggs per root system and final nematode population in 200 cc soil was recorded, where combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1145 · show in text ↑
e1

“Meloidogyne javanica infecting tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–147 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria with mustard cake gave the minimum nematode eggs per root system.

Treatment
combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cakee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat1pathogen
Outcome
eggs per root systeme0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum number of galls, eggs per root system and final nematode population in 200 cc soil was recorded, where combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1145 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–130 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pasteuria with mustard cake gave the minimum final soil nematode population.

Treatment
combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cakee0
Interactor
Meloidogyne javanicaMeloidogyne javanicat1pathogen
Outcome
final nematode population in 200 cc soile0
Direction
Minimume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 141–147 · show in text ↑
e0

“Minimum number of galls, eggs per root system and final nematode population in 200 cc soil was recorded, where combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake were applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1145 · show in text ↑
t1

“Meloidogyne javanica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–130 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors favored Pasteuria with mustard cake for tomato nursery nematode management.

Interactor
M. javanicaMeloidogyne javanicae0pathogen
Outcome
more promising approach in the management of M. javanica in tomato nurserye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“combined application of P. penetrans with mustard cake seemed to be more promising approach in the management of M. javanica in tomato nursery as it caused greater nematode suppression and improved plant growth parameters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1261–1482 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · Meloidogyne javanica · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.