Paper · 2010 · Acta Scientiarum Polonorum. Agricultura

EFFECT OF FERTILISATION DOSE, PLANT PROTECTION INPUT, AND SEEDING DENSITY ON THE YIELD AND GRAIN TECHNOLOGICAL QUALITY OF WINTER WHEAT GROWN IN SHORT-TIME MONOCULTURE ON LIGHT SOIL

M. Piekarczyk

6
claims
10
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In field experiment carried out in years 2003-2007 at the Research Station at Mocheek (53 o 13' N; 17 o 51' E) near Bydgoszcz on good rye complex soil, the effect of fertilisation (147 and 221 kg NPK·ha -1 ), plant protection (control - no plant protection, herbicide, herbicide + fungicide), and seeding density (400 and 600 grains·m -2 ) on the yield and grain technological quality of winter wheat cultivar Tonacja grown in short-time monoculture was estimated. Research showed that winter wheat cultivation in 3-year monoculture on light soil caused a significant decrease in its yield from 5.70 t·ha -1 in the first year of monoculture to 2.92 t·ha -1 and 1.73 t·ha -1 , respectively, in the second and third year of continuous cultivation. Advantageous effect on the size and quality of the grain yield of winter wheat grown in monoculture was given by the application of herbicide Huzar 05 WG and an increase in the fertilisation dose of NPK. Single application of fungicide Alert 375 SC during vegetative growth and an increase in seeding density did not create such an effect.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield fell significantly in the second monoculture year to 2.92 t·ha -1 from 5.70 t·ha -1 in the first year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
3-year monoculturee0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
2.92 t·ha -1e0
Qualifier
5.70 t·ha -1e0
Comparator
first year of monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat cultivation in 3-year monoculture on light soil caused a significant decrease in its yield from 5.70 t·ha -1 in the first year of monoculture to 2.92 t·ha -1 and 1.73 t·ha -1 , respectively, in the second and third year of continuous cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Winter wheat yield fell significantly in the third monoculture year to 1.73 t·ha -1 from 5.70 t·ha -1 in the first year.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
third year of continuous cultivatione0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasee0
Value
1.73 t·ha -1e0
Qualifier
5.70 t·ha -1e0
Comparator
first year of monoculturee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“winter wheat cultivation in 3-year monoculture on light soil caused a significant decrease in its yield from 5.70 t·ha -1 in the first year of monoculture to 2.92 t·ha -1 and 1.73 t·ha -1 , respectively, in the second and third year of continuous cultivation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 486–744 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide Huzar 05 WG improved wheat grain yield size and quality in monoculture.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
herbicide Huzar 05 WGe0
Outcome
size and quality of the grain yielde0
Direction
Advantageous effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Advantageous effect on the size and quality of the grain yield of winter wheat grown in monoculture was given by the application of herbicide Huzar 05 WG”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–899 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NPK fertilizer dose improved wheat grain yield size and quality in monoculture.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
an increase in the fertilisation dose of NPKe0
Outcome
size and quality of the grain yielde0
Direction
Advantageous effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Advantageous effect on the size and quality of the grain yield of winter wheat grown in monoculture was given by the application of herbicide Huzar 05 WG and an increase in the fertilisation dose of NPK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–948 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Single fungicide Alert 375 SC application did not produce the beneficial grain yield and quality effect.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Single application of fungicide Alert 375 SC during vegetative growthe0
Outcome
size and quality of the grain yielde1
Direction
did not create such an effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Single application of fungicide Alert 375 SC during vegetative growth and an increase in seeding density did not create such an effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“Advantageous effect on the size and quality of the grain yield of winter wheat grown in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing seeding density did not produce the beneficial grain yield and quality effect.

Taxon
WINTER WHEATTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
an increase in seeding densitye0
Outcome
size and quality of the grain yielde1
Direction
did not create such an effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“an increase in seeding density did not create such an effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1024–1085 · show in text ↑
e1

“Advantageous effect on the size and quality of the grain yield of winter wheat grown in monoculture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 746–845 · show in text ↑
t0

“WINTER WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 122–134 · show in text ↑

herbicide · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fungicide · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 7 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

density · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 8 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

173 papers: 146 positive, 27 negative or no effect

145 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

169 papers more in this group

See all 173 papers →

rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 253 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 253 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.